On Fri 28 Mar 2014 08:55:30 AM CST, Karol Kozubal wrote:
Hi Jianing,
Sorry for the late reply, I missed your contribution to the thread.
Thank you for your response. I am still waiting for some of my hardware
and will begin testing the new setup with firefly once it is available as
a
-threads=16 --test=fileio --file-total-size=3G
--file-test-mode=rndrw run
sysbench --num-threads=16 --test=fileio --file-total-size=3G
--file-test-mode=rndrw cleanup
Thanks in advance,
Best regards,
German Anders
--- Original message ---
Asunto: Re: [ceph-users] RBD as backend
Hi, Karol
Here is something that I can share. We are running Ceph as an Exchange
Backend via iSCSI. We currently host about 2000 mailboxes which is about
7 TB data overall. Our configuration is
- Proxy Node (with tgt daemon) x 2
- Ceph Monitor x 3 (virtual machines)
- Ceph OSD x 50 (SATA 7200rpm
Hi Everyone,
I am just wondering if any of you are running a ceph cluster with an iSCSI
target front end? I know this isn’t available out of the box, unfortunately in
one particular use case we are looking at providing iSCSI access and it's a
necessity. I am liking the idea of having rbd
On 03/15/2014 04:11 PM, Karol Kozubal wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am just wondering if any of you are running a ceph cluster with an
iSCSI target front end? I know this isn’t available out of the box,
unfortunately in one particular use case we are looking at providing
iSCSI access and it's a
Hi Wido,
I will have some new hardware for running tests in the next two weeks or
so and will report my findings once I get a chance to run some tests. I
will disable writeback on the target side as I will be attempting to
configure an ssd caching pool of 24 ssd's with writeback for the main pool
On 03/15/2014 05:40 PM, Karol Kozubal wrote:
Hi Wido,
I will have some new hardware for running tests in the next two weeks or
so and will report my findings once I get a chance to run some tests. I
will disable writeback on the target side as I will be attempting to
configure an ssd caching
I just re-read the documentation… It looks like its a proposed feature
that is in development. I will have to adjust my test in consequence in
that case.
Any one out there have any ideas when this will be implemented? Or what
the plans look like as of right now?
On 2014-03-15, 1:17 PM, Karol
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, Karol Kozubal wrote:
I just re-read the documentation… It looks like its a proposed feature
that is in development. I will have to adjust my test in consequence in
that case.
Any one out there have any ideas when this will be implemented? Or what
the plans look like as
