On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:23 PM, qisy wrote:
> Yan, Zheng:
>
> Thanks for your reply.
> But change into jewel, application read/write disk slowly. confirms the
> fio tested iops.
Does your application use buffered IO or direct IO? direct-IO in
hammer actually is buffered IO, it is expect
Yan, Zheng:
Thanks for your reply.
But change into jewel, application read/write disk slowly. confirms
the fio tested iops.
Does there any other possibles?
在 16/6/1 21:39, Yan, Zheng 写道:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:52 PM, qisy wrote:
my test fio
fio -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k -direc
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:52 PM, qisy wrote:
> my test fio
>
> fio -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k -direct=1 -thread -rw=randwrite -size=1G
> -filename=test.iso -name="CEPH 4KB randwrite test" -iodepth=32 -runtime=60
>
You were testing direct-IO performance. Hammer does not handle
direct-IO correctly, da
my test fio
fio -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k -direct=1 -thread -rw=randwrite -size=1G
-filename=test.iso -name="CEPH 4KB randwrite test" -iodepth=32 -runtime=60
在 16/6/1 15:22, Yan, Zheng 写道:
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:22 PM, qisy wrote:
Hi,
After jewel released fs product ready version,
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:22 PM, qisy wrote:
> Hi,
> After jewel released fs product ready version, I upgrade the old hammer
> cluster, but iops droped a lot
>
> I made a test, with 3 nodes, each one have 8c 16G 1osd, the osd device
> got 15000 iops
>
> I found ceph-fuse client has be
Hi,
After jewel released fs product ready version, I upgrade the old
hammer cluster, but iops droped a lot
I made a test, with 3 nodes, each one have 8c 16G 1osd, the osd
device got 15000 iops
I found ceph-fuse client has better performance on hammer than jewel.
fio randwrit