On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:14 PM Eugen Block wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> I don't know about keeping the osd-id but I just partially recreated
> your scenario. I wiped one OSD and recreated it. You are trying to
> re-use the existing block.db-LV with the device path (--block.db
> /dev/vg-name/lv-name)
Hi Dan,
I don't know about keeping the osd-id but I just partially recreated
your scenario. I wiped one OSD and recreated it. You are trying to
re-use the existing block.db-LV with the device path (--block.db
/dev/vg-name/lv-name) instead the lv notation (--block.db
vg-name/lv-name):
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:25 PM Dan van der Ster wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:17 PM Alfredo Deza wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:00 AM Alfredo Deza wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:47 AM Dan van der Ster
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > We've
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 02:17:56PM +0100, Dan van der Ster wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:05 PM Alfredo Deza wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:26 AM Dan van der Ster wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:17 PM Alfredo Deza wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:00 AM Alfredo Deza wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:05 PM Alfredo Deza wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:26 AM Dan van der Ster wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:17 PM Alfredo Deza wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:00 AM Alfredo Deza wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:47 AM Dan van
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:26 AM Dan van der Ster wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:17 PM Alfredo Deza wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:00 AM Alfredo Deza wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:47 AM Dan van der Ster
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > We've
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:17 PM Alfredo Deza wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:00 AM Alfredo Deza wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:47 AM Dan van der Ster
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > We've just hit our first OSD replacement on a host created with
> > > `ceph-volume
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:00 AM Alfredo Deza wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:47 AM Dan van der Ster wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We've just hit our first OSD replacement on a host created with
> > `ceph-volume lvm batch` with mixed hdds+ssds.
> >
> > The hdd /dev/sdq was prepared like
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:47 AM Dan van der Ster wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We've just hit our first OSD replacement on a host created with
> `ceph-volume lvm batch` with mixed hdds+ssds.
>
> The hdd /dev/sdq was prepared like this:
># ceph-volume lvm batch /dev/sd[m-r] /dev/sdac --yes
>
> Then
Hi all,
We've just hit our first OSD replacement on a host created with
`ceph-volume lvm batch` with mixed hdds+ssds.
The hdd /dev/sdq was prepared like this:
# ceph-volume lvm batch /dev/sd[m-r] /dev/sdac --yes
Then /dev/sdq failed and was then zapped like this:
# ceph-volume lvm zap
10 matches
Mail list logo