Hello,
just to close this up as far as my upgrade is concerned.
I choose not to go for 0.94.6 at this point in time, too fresh off the
boat for my taste.
Phasing in the cache tier literally caused 10 Minutes of Terror (tm
pending), including the first ever "wrongly marked down" OSDs I've seen
gt; > -Message d'origine-----
> > > De : Jason Dillaman [mailto:dilla...@redhat.com]
> > > Envoyé : mercredi 24 février 2016 19:16
> > > À : SCHAER Frederic <frederic.sch...@cea.fr>
> > > Cc : ceph-us...@ceph.com; HONORE Pierre-Francois <
> > > pi
indeed.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : Jason Dillaman [mailto:dilla...@redhat.com]
> > Envoyé : mercredi 24 février 2016 19:16
> > À : SCHAER Frederic <frederic.sch...@cea.fr>
> > Cc : ceph-us...@ceph.com; HONORE Pierr
a...@redhat.com]
> Envoyé : mercredi 24 février 2016 19:16
> À : SCHAER Frederic <frederic.sch...@cea.fr>
> Cc : ceph-us...@ceph.com; HONORE Pierre-Francois <
> pierre-francois.hon...@cea.fr>
> Objet : Re: [ceph-users] ceph hammer : rbd info/Status : operation not
> supp
: mercredi 24 février 2016 19:16
À : SCHAER Frederic <frederic.sch...@cea.fr>
Cc : ceph-us...@ceph.com; HONORE Pierre-Francois <pierre-francois.hon...@cea.fr>
Objet : Re: [ceph-users] ceph hammer : rbd info/Status : operation not
supported (95) (EC+RBD tier pools)
If you run "ra
..@gol.com>
> > Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
> > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] ceph hammer : rbd info/Status : operation not
> > supported (95) (EC+RBD tier pools)
> >
> > I'll speak to what I can answer off the top of my head. The most
> important
> > point is
Hello Robert,
Thanks for the speedy reply.
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:44:47 -0700 Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> We have not seen this issue, but we don't run EC pools yet (we are
> waiting for multiple layers to be available).
Yeah, that seems to be the consensus here, only EC is affected.
> We are
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
> Jason Dillaman
> Sent: 25 February 2016 01:30
> To: Christian Balzer <ch...@gol.com>
> Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] ceph hammer :
We have not seen this issue, but we don't run EC pools yet (we are waiting
for multiple layers to be available). We are not running 0.94.6 in
production yet either. We have adopted the policy to only run released
versions in production unless there is a really pressing need to have a
patch. We are
I'll speak to what I can answer off the top of my head. The most important
point is that this issue is only related to EC pool base tiers, not replicated
pools.
> Hello Jason (Ceph devs et al),
>
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:15:34 -0500 (EST) Jason Dillaman wrote:
>
> > If you run "rados -p ls
Hello Jason (Ceph devs et al),
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:15:34 -0500 (EST) Jason Dillaman wrote:
> If you run "rados -p ls | grep "rbd_id." and
> don't see that object, you are experiencing that issue [1].
>
> You can attempt to work around this issue by running "rados -p irfu-virt
> setomapval
t;pierre-francois.hon...@cea.fr>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 12:56:48 PM
> Subject: [ceph-users] ceph hammer : rbd info/Status : operation not supported
> (95) (EC+RBD tier pools)
> Hi,
> I just started testing VMs inside ceph this week, ceph-hammer 0.94-5 here.
> I b
Hi,
I just started testing VMs inside ceph this week, ceph-hammer 0.94-5 here.
I built several pools, using pool tiering:
- A small replicated SSD pool (5 SSDs only, but I thought it'd be
better for IOPS, I intend to test the difference with disks only)
- Overlaying a larger
13 matches
Mail list logo
