however is a lot more
tolerant of this and can jump through gateways etc. no problem.
From: ceph-users on behalf of Andras Pataki
Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2018 6:40:44 AM
To: Marc Roos; ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] cephfs kernel client stability
(the one you are
> > referencing). The RedHat/CentOS kernels are not "old kernel clients"
> > - they contains various backports of hundreds of patches to all kinds
> > of subsystems of Linux. What is unclear there is exactly what ceph
> > client RedHat is backpor
ki [mailto:apat...@flatironinstitute.org]
Sent: maandag 1 oktober 2018 20:10
To: ceph-users
Subject: [ceph-users] cephfs kernel client stability
We have so far been using ceph-fuse for mounting cephfs, but the small
file performance of ceph-fuse is often problematic. We've been testing
the k
x
-Original Message-
From: Andras Pataki [mailto:apat...@flatironinstitute.org]
Sent: maandag 1 oktober 2018 20:10
To: ceph-users
Subject: [ceph-users] cephfs kernel client stability
We have so far been using ceph-fuse for mounting cephfs, but the small
file performance of ceph-fuse
om: Andras Pataki [mailto:apat...@flatironinstitute.org]
Sent: maandag 1 oktober 2018 20:10
To: ceph-users
Subject: [ceph-users] cephfs kernel client stability
We have so far been using ceph-fuse for mounting cephfs, but the small
file performance of ceph-fuse is often problematic. We've be
We have so far been using ceph-fuse for mounting cephfs, but the small
file performance of ceph-fuse is often problematic. We've been testing
the kernel client, and have seen some pretty bad crashes/hangs.
What is the policy on fixes to the kernel client? Is only the latest
stable kernel upd
