Re: [ceph-users] fuse or kernel to mount rbd?

Hi Sage et al, Thanks for the info! How stable are the cutting edge kernels like 3.13 ? Is 3.8 (e.g. from Ubuntu Raring) a better choice? Thanks again! ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] fuse or kernel to mount rbd?

On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Chad Seys wrote: Hi Sage et al, Thanks for the info! How stable are the cutting edge kernels like 3.13 ? Is 3.8 (e.g. from Ubuntu Raring) a better choice? 3.8 will not support layering. From RBD's perspective, the newest kernels are the most stable. If it were me I

Re: [ceph-users] fuse or kernel to mount rbd?

Not to 3.2. I would recommend running a more recent ubuntu kernel (which I *think* the support on 12.04 still) like 3.8 or 3.11. Those kernels should be pretty stable provided the ubuntu kernel guys are keeping up with the mainline stable kernels at kernel.org (they generally do). Thanks!

[ceph-users] fuse or kernel to mount rbd?

Hi, I'm running Debian Wheezy which has kernel version 3.2.54-2 . Should I be using rbd-fuse 0.72.2 or the kernel client to mount rbd devices? I.e. This is an old kernel relative to Emperor, but maybe bugs are backported to the kernel? Thanks! Chad.

Re: [ceph-users] fuse or kernel to mount rbd?

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Chad Seys wrote: Hi, I'm running Debian Wheezy which has kernel version 3.2.54-2 . Should I be using rbd-fuse 0.72.2 or the kernel client to mount rbd devices? I.e. This is an old kernel relative to Emperor, but maybe bugs are backported to the kernel? Not to