[ceph-users] hammer (0.94.1) - image must support layering(38) Function not implemented on v2 image

2015-04-20 Thread Nikola Ciprich
Hello, I'd like to ask about another problem I've stumbled upon.. I've got format 2 image + snapshot, and while trying to protect snapshot I'm getting following error: [root@vfnphav1a ~]# rbd ls -l ssd2r NAMESIZE PARENT FMT PROT LOCK fio_test

Re: [ceph-users] hammer (0.94.1) - image must support layering(38) Function not implemented on v2 image

2015-04-20 Thread Jason Dillaman
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] hammer (0.94.1) - image must support layering(38) Function not implemented on v2 image Hello Jason, here it is: [root@vfnphav1a ceph]# rbd snap protect ssd2r/template-win2k8-20150420_@snap 2015-04-20 18:33:43.635427 7fa0344ca760 20 librbd::ImageCtx: enabling caching

Re: [ceph-users] hammer (0.94.1) - image must support layering(38) Function not implemented on v2 image

2015-04-20 Thread Nikola Ciprich
...@redhat.com Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 12:41:26 PM Subject: Re: [ceph-users] hammer (0.94.1) - image must support layering(38) Function not implemented on v2 image Hello Jason, here it is: [root@vfnphav1a ceph]# rbd snap protect ssd2r/template-win2k8

Re: [ceph-users] hammer (0.94.1) - image must support layering(38) Function not implemented on v2 image

2015-04-20 Thread Nikola Ciprich
Subject: [ceph-users] hammer (0.94.1) - image must support layering(38) Function not implemented on v2 image Hello, I'd like to ask about another problem I've stumbled upon.. I've got format 2 image + snapshot, and while trying to protect snapshot I'm getting following error: [root

Re: [ceph-users] hammer (0.94.1) - image must support layering(38) Function not implemented on v2 image

2015-04-20 Thread Jason Dillaman
@lists.ceph.com Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:54:17 AM Subject: [ceph-users] hammer (0.94.1) - image must support layering(38) Function not implemented on v2 image Hello, I'd like to ask about another problem I've stumbled upon.. I've got format 2 image + snapshot, and while trying to protect