Re: [ceph-users] replication over slow uplink

2015-05-27 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Christian Balzer wrote: > On Wed, 27 May 2015 14:06:43 -0700 Gregory Farnum wrote: > >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:35 PM, John Peebles wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm hoping for advice on whether Ceph could be used in an atypical use >> > case. Specifically, I have a

Re: [ceph-users] replication over slow uplink

2015-05-27 Thread Christian Balzer
On Wed, 27 May 2015 14:06:43 -0700 Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:35 PM, John Peebles wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm hoping for advice on whether Ceph could be used in an atypical use > > case. Specifically, I have about ~20TB of files that need replicated > > to 2 different sites.

Re: [ceph-users] replication over slow uplink

2015-05-27 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:35 PM, John Peebles wrote: > Hi, > > I'm hoping for advice on whether Ceph could be used in an atypical use case. > Specifically, I have about ~20TB of files that need replicated to 2 > different sites. Each site has its own internal gigabit ethernet network. > However, t

[ceph-users] replication over slow uplink

2015-05-19 Thread John Peebles
Hi, I'm hoping for advice on whether Ceph could be used in an atypical use case. Specifically, I have about ~20TB of files that need replicated to 2 different sites. Each site has its own internal gigabit ethernet network. However, the connection between the sites is only ~320kbits. I'm trying to