Dear expert
could you help to provide some guide upgrade Ceph from firefly to giant ?
many thanks !
2014-10-30 15:37 GMT+07:00 Joao Eduardo Luis joao.l...@inktank.com:
On 10/30/2014 05:54 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Nigel Williams wrote:
On 30/10/2014 8:56 AM, Sage Weil
On 10/30/2014 05:54 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Nigel Williams wrote:
On 30/10/2014 8:56 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
* *Degraded vs misplaced*: the Ceph health reports from 'ceph -s' and
related commands now make a distinction between data that is
degraded (there are fewer than
This release will form the basis for the Giant stable series,
v0.87.x. Highlights for Giant include:
* *RADOS Performance*: a range of improvements have been made in the
OSD and client-side librados code that improve the throughput on
flash backends and improve parallelism and scaling on
On 30/10/2014 8:56 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
* *Degraded vs misplaced*: the Ceph health reports from 'ceph -s' and
related commands now make a distinction between data that is
degraded (there are fewer than the desired number of copies) and
data that is misplaced (stored in the wrong
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:40:38 +1100 Nigel Williams wrote:
On 30/10/2014 8:56 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
* *Degraded vs misplaced*: the Ceph health reports from 'ceph -s' and
related commands now make a distinction between data that is
degraded (there are fewer than the desired number of
On 30/10/2014 11:51 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
Thus objects are (temporarily) not where they're supposed to be, but still
present in sufficient replication.
thanks for the reminder, I suppose that is obvious :-)
A much more benign scenario than degraded and I hope that this doesn't
even
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Nigel Williams wrote:
On 30/10/2014 8:56 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
* *Degraded vs misplaced*: the Ceph health reports from 'ceph -s' and
related commands now make a distinction between data that is
degraded (there are fewer than the desired number of copies) and
