On 02/16/2017 09:47 AM, John Spray wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Dietmar Rieder
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12/13/2016 12:35 PM, John Spray wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Dietmar Rieder
>>> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Dietmar Rieder
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/13/2016 12:35 PM, John Spray wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Dietmar Rieder
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this is good news! Thanks.
>>>
>>> As far as I see the
Hi,
On 12/13/2016 12:35 PM, John Spray wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Dietmar Rieder
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is good news! Thanks.
>>
>> As far as I see the RBD supports (experimentally) now EC data pools. Is
>> this true also for CephFS? It is not
OK, thanks for the update Greg!
- Darrell
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Darrell Enns wrote:
> Are CephFS snapshots still considered unstable/experimental in Kraken?
Sadly, yes. I had a solution but they didn't account for hard links.
When we decided we wanted to support those instead of ignoring them or
trying
Are CephFS snapshots still considered unstable/experimental in Kraken?
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Dietmar Rieder
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
> The mentioned modification of the pool validation would than allow for
> CephFS having the data pools on EC while keeping the metadata on a
> replicated pool, right?
I
Hi John,
Thanks for your answer.
The mentioned modification of the pool validation would than allow for
CephFS having the data pools on EC while keeping the metadata on a
replicated pool, right?
Dietmar
On 12/13/2016 12:35 PM, John Spray wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Dietmar Rieder
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Dietmar Rieder
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is good news! Thanks.
>
> As far as I see the RBD supports (experimentally) now EC data pools. Is
> this true also for CephFS? It is not stated in the announce, so I wonder
> if and when EC pools are
Hi,
this is good news! Thanks.
As far as I see the RBD supports (experimentally) now EC data pools. Is
this true also for CephFS? It is not stated in the announce, so I wonder
if and when EC pools are planned to be supported by CephFS.
~regards
Dietmar
On 12/13/2016 03:28 AM, Abhishek L
It looks like the second releasenote in that section answers my question.
sortbitwise is only supported in jewel, and it's required to be already
set for Kraken upgraded OSDs to even start up, so one must go to Jewel
first.
The section heading should probably say just "Upgrading to Kraken"
Hi! Can you clarify whether this release note applies to Jewel upgrades
only? Ie, can we go Infernalis -> Kraken? It is in the 'upgrading from
jewel' section which would imply that it doesn't apply to Infernalis ->
Kraken. (or any other version to kraken), but it does say 'All clusters'.
12 matches
Mail list logo