Re: [ceph-users] why is there heavy read traffic during object delete?

2016-02-11 Thread Gregory Farnum
Looks like it to me, yeah. Not sure why it took so long to get noticed though (that is, is that behavior present in the release you're using, or is it a new bug)? -Greg On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Stephen Lord wrote: > > I saw this go by in the commit log: > > commit cc2200c5e60caecf7931e54

Re: [ceph-users] why is there heavy read traffic during object delete?

2016-02-11 Thread Stephen Lord
I saw this go by in the commit log: commit cc2200c5e60caecf7931e546f6522b2ba364227f Merge: f8d5807 12c083e Author: Sage Weil Date: Thu Feb 11 08:44:35 2016 -0500 Merge pull request #7537 from ifed01/wip-no-promote-for-delete-fix osd: fix unnecessary object promotion when deleting

Re: [ceph-users] why is there heavy read traffic during object delete?

2016-02-05 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Stephen Lord wrote: > > I looked at this system this morning, and the it actually finished what it was > doing. The erasure coded pool still contains all the data and the cache > pool has about a million zero sized objects: > > > GLOBAL: > SIZE AVAIL R

Re: [ceph-users] why is there heavy read traffic during object delete?

2016-02-05 Thread Stephen Lord
I looked at this system this morning, and the it actually finished what it was doing. The erasure coded pool still contains all the data and the cache pool has about a million zero sized objects: GLOBAL: SIZE AVAIL RAW USED %RAW USED OBJECTS 15090G 9001G608

Re: [ceph-users] why is there heavy read traffic during object delete?

2016-02-04 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Stephen Lord wrote: > >> On Feb 4, 2016, at 6:51 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: >> >> I presume we're doing reads in order to gather some object metadata >> from the cephfs-data pool; and the (small) newly-created objects in >> cache-data are definitely whiteout objects

Re: [ceph-users] why is there heavy read traffic during object delete?

2016-02-04 Thread Stephen Lord
> On Feb 4, 2016, at 6:51 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > > I presume we're doing reads in order to gather some object metadata > from the cephfs-data pool; and the (small) newly-created objects in > cache-data are definitely whiteout objects indicating the object no > longer exists logically. > >

Re: [ceph-users] why is there heavy read traffic during object delete?

2016-02-04 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Stephen Lord wrote: > I setup a cephfs file system with a cache tier over an erasure coded tier as > an experiment: > > ceph osd erasure-code-profile set raid6 k=4 m=2 > ceph osd pool create cephfs-metadata 512 512 > ceph osd pool set cephfs-metadata size 3 >

[ceph-users] why is there heavy read traffic during object delete?

2016-02-04 Thread Stephen Lord
I setup a cephfs file system with a cache tier over an erasure coded tier as an experiment: ceph osd erasure-code-profile set raid6 k=4 m=2 ceph osd pool create cephfs-metadata 512 512 ceph osd pool set cephfs-metadata size 3 ceph osd pool create cache-data 2048 2048 ceph osd pool cre