On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 1:51 PM, René Gallati c...@gallati.net wrote:
Hello Antonio,
I use aptly to manage my repositories and mix and match (and snapshot / pin)
I didn't know aptly, thank you for mentioning.
specific versions and non-standard packages, but as far as I know, the
kernel from
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 1:51 PM, René Gallati c...@gallati.net wrote:
Hello Antonio,
I use aptly to manage my repositories and mix and match (and snapshot / pin)
I didn't know aptly, thank you for mentioning.
specific versions and non-standard packages, but as far as I know, the
kernel from
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Cephers,
Have anyone of you decided to put Giant into production instead of Firefly?
This is very interesting to me too: we are going to deploy a large
ceph cluster on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, and so far what I have found
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Cephers,
Have anyone of you decided to put Giant into production instead of Firefly?
This is very interesting to me too: we are going to deploy a large
ceph cluster on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, and so far what I have found
Of
Antonio Messina
Sent: 05 December 2014 09:37
To: Anthony Alba
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Giant or Firefly for production
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Cephers,
Have anyone of you decided to put Giant into production
What are the kernel versions involved ?
We have Ubuntu precise clients talking to a Ubuntu trusty cluster without
issues - with tunables optimal.
0.88 (Giant) and 0.89 has been working well for us as far the client and
Openstack are concerned.
This link provides some insight as to the possible
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:25 PM, David Moreau Simard dmsim...@iweb.com wrote:
What are the kernel versions involved ?
We have Ubuntu precise clients talking to a Ubuntu trusty cluster without
issues - with tunables optimal.
0.88 (Giant) and 0.89 has been working well for us as far the client
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Nick Fisk n...@fisk.me.uk wrote:
This is probably due to the Kernel RBD client not being recent enough. Have
you tried upgrading your kernel to a newer version? 3.16 should contain all
the relevant features required by Giant.
I would rather tune the tunables, as
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/
I'm running 3.17 on my trusty clients without issue
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Antonio Messina antonio.mess...@s3it.uzh.ch
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Nick Fisk n...@fisk.me.uk wrote:
This is probably due to the Kernel RBD
should
be released early next year.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
Antonio Messina
Sent: 05 December 2014 15:38
To: Nick Fisk
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com; Antonio Messina
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Giant or Firefly
To: Nick Fisk
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com; Antonio Messina
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Giant or Firefly for production
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Nick Fisk n...@fisk.me.uk wrote:
This is probably due to the Kernel RBD client not being recent enough.
Have you tried upgrading your kernel
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Antonio Messina wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Cephers,
Have anyone of you decided to put Giant into production instead of Firefly?
This is very interesting to me too: we are going to deploy a large
ceph cluster
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Antonio Messina wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Cephers,
Have anyone of you decided to put Giant into production instead of Firefly?
This is very
Hi all, just an update
After setting chooseleaf_vary_r to 0 _and_ removing an pool with
erasure coding, I was able to run rbd map.
Thank you all for the help
.a.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Antonio Messina
antonio.mess...@s3it.uzh.ch wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Sage Weil
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Antonio Messina wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Antonio Messina wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Cephers,
Have anyone of you decided to put Giant
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
The v2 rule means you have a crush rule for erasure coding. Do you have
an EC pool in your cluster?
Yes indeed. I didn't know EC pool was incompatible with the current
kernel, I only tested it with rados bench and VMs, I guess.
16 matches
Mail list logo
