> ?I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended
> for production clusters.?
InkTank had sort of discouraged the use of ceph-deploy; in 2014 we used it only
to deploy OSDs.
Some time later the message changed.
___
ceph-users
use something like ceph-ansible in
> parallel for the missing stuff, I can only hope we will find a (full
> time?!) maintainer for ceph-deploy and keep it alive. PLEASE ;)
>
>
>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 05. April 2018 um 08:53 Uhr
> Von: "Wido den Hollander" <w...@42on.com&
like ceph-ansible in
parallel for the missing stuff, I can only hope we will find a (full time?!)
maintainer for ceph-deploy and keep it alive. PLEASE ;)
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 05. April 2018 um 08:53 Uhr
Von: "Wido den Hollander" <w...@42on.com>
An: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Betr
On 04/04/2018 08:58 PM, Robert Stanford wrote:
>
> I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended
> for production clusters. Why was that? Is this still the case? We
> have a lot of problems automating deployment without ceph-deploy.
>
>
In the end it is just a
On 04/04/2018 08:58 PM, Robert Stanford wrote:
>
> I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended
> for production clusters. Why was that? Is this still the case? We
> have a lot of problems automating deployment without ceph-deploy.
>
We are using it in production on
We use ceph-deploy in production. That said, our crush map is getting more
complex and we are starting to make use of other tooling as that occurs.
But we still use ceph-deploy to install ceph and bootstrap OSDs.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 1:58 PM Robert Stanford
wrote:
>
>
Am 4. April 2018 20:58:19 MESZ schrieb Robert Stanford
:
>I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended
>for
>production clusters. Why was that? Is this still the case? We have a
I cannot Imagine that. Did use it Now a few versions before 2.0