If I understand you correctly, you seem to want to bypass a perceived
bottleneck. Yes, you can have many rados gateways (RGW) running. You can
also bypass RGW and go directly with librados and use your own striping but
I would not recommend that unless you really know what you're doing and
have
I'm glad it worked.
You can set a warning to catch this early next time (1GB)
*mon leveldb size warn = 10*
*Kobi Laredo*
*Cloud Systems Engineer* | (*408) 409-KOBI*
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Chu Duc Minh chu.ducm...@gmail.com wrote:
@Kobi Laredo: thank you! It's exactly my
I redid my entire Ceph build going back to to CentOS 7 hoping to the
get the same performance I did last time.
The rados bench test was the best I have ever had with a time of 740
MB wr and 1300 MB rd. This was even better than the first rados bench
test that had performance equal to PanFS. I find
Hi,
I am designing an infrastructure using Ceph.
The client will fetch data though HTTP.
I saw the radosgw, that is made for that, it has, however, some weakness
for me : as far as I understood, when a client want to fetch a file, it
connects to the radosgw, which will connect to the right OSD
Hi
There is no limit on the number of gateways you can deploy. So just put a load
balancer in front of many of them to avoid SPOF and bottleneck.
Rgds
JC
While moving. Excuse unintended typos.
On Mar 28, 2015, at 08:22, c...@jack.fr.eu.org wrote:
Hi,
I am designing an infrastructure
