Re: [ceph-users] Luminous/Ubuntu 16.04 kernel recommendation ?

Would be interested as well. - Kevin 2018-02-04 19:00 GMT+01:00 Yoann Moulin : > Hello, > > What is the best kernel for Luminous on Ubuntu 16.04 ? > > Is linux-image-virtual-lts-xenial still the best one ? Or > linux-virtual-hwe-16.04 will offer some improvement ? > >

[ceph-users] HEALTH_ERR resulted from a bad sector

Our Ceph cluster entered into that HEALTH_ERR last week. We’re running Infernalis and that was the first time I’ve seen it in that state. Even when OSD instances dropped off we’ve only seen HEALTH_WARN. The output of `ceph status` looks like this: [root@r01u02-b ~]# ceph status cluster

[ceph-users] Ceph Developer Monthly - February 2018

Hey Cephers, This is just a friendly reminder that the next Ceph Developer Montly meeting is coming up: http://wiki.ceph.com/Planning If you have work that you're doing that it a feature work, significant backports, or anything you would like to discuss with the core team, please add it to the

[ceph-users] Antw: RBD device as SBD device for pacemaker cluster

Hello Kai, we use RBD's as part of pacemaker resource groups for 2 years on Hammer with no problems. The resource is always configured in active/passive mode due to the fact that the filesystem is not cluster aware. Therefore during switchover the RBD's are unmapped cleanly on the active node

Re: [ceph-users] Infinite loop in radosgw-usage show

Hi, On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:04 AM, Ingo Reimann wrote: > Just to add - > > We wrote a little wrapper, that reads the output of "radosgw-admin usage > show" and stops, when the loop starts. When we add all entries by > ourselves, the result is correct. Moreover - the

Re: [ceph-users] object lifecycle scope

Smallest scope is per-bucket. Daniel On 02/06/2018 02:24 PM, Robert Stanford wrote:  Hello Ceph users.  Is object lifecycle (currently expiration) for rgw implementable on a per-object basis, or is the smallest scope the bucket? ___ ceph-users

Re: [ceph-users] measure performance / latency in blustore

Hi, Am 14.12.2017 um 15:02 schrieb Sage Weil: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: >> >> Am 14.12.2017 um 13:22 schrieb Sage Weil: >>> On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: Hello, Am 21.11.2017 um 11:06 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:

[ceph-users] RadosGW Admin Ops API Access Problem

Hello Everyone, I have a Ceph test setup with 3 mons, 3 RGWs, 5 OSD nodes and 22 OSDs. RadosGW instances run on the monitor nodes and they are behind a load balancer. I run RGW instances in the full debug mode (20/20 for rgw and 20/20 for civet web). I can easily access RGW via S3 API with any

[ceph-users] Unable to activate OSD's

Greetings ceph-users. I have been trying to build a test cluster in a KVM environment - something I have done before successfully before but this time I'm running into an issue I can't seem to get past. My Internet searches have shown instances of this by other users that involved either