On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Erik Logtenberg e...@logtenberg.eu wrote:
Hi Ilya,
Do you happen to know when this fix will be released?
Is upgrading to a newer kernel (client side) still a solution/workaround
too? If yes, which kernel version is required?
This fix is purely server-side,
Hi,
erasure-code: implement alignment on chunk sizes
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1890
should resolve the unnecessary overhead for Cauchy and will hopefully be merged
soon.
Cheers
On 21/06/2014 14:57, David Z wrote:
Hi Loic,
Thanks for your reply.
I actually used the tool you
Hi,
best way to upgrade: use official ceph repository. It has firefly (0.80.1) for
precise. (http://ceph.com/docs/master/install/get-packages/)
Moreover you should install the trusty-kernel (linux-generic-lts-trusty)
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards,
--
Consultant
Dipl.-Inf. Uwe
Well as mentioned, I do not want to upgrade operating system. Can we not
run ceph 0.79 on 12.04 Ubuntu ?
On Jun 21, 2014 1:54 PM, Uwe Grohnwaldt u...@grohnwaldt.eu wrote:
Hi,
best way to upgrade: use official ceph repository. It has firefly (0.80.1)
for precise.
I can reproduce this in:
ceph version 0.81-423-g1fb4574
on Ubuntu 14.04. I have a two osd cluster with data on two sata spinners
(WD blacks) and journals on two ssd (Crucual m4's). I getting about 3.5
MB/s (kernel and librbd) using your dd command with direct on. Leaving
off direct I'm
On 22/06/14 14:09, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Upgrading the VM to 14.04 and restesting the case *without* direct I get:
- 164 MB/s (librbd)
- 115 MB/s (kernel 3.13)
So managing to almost get native performance out of the librbd case. I
tweaked both filestore max and min sync intervals (100 and 10
