El 09/07/14 16:53, Christian Balzer escribió:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 07:07:50 -0500 Mark Nelson wrote:
On 07/09/2014 06:52 AM, Xabier Elkano wrote:
El 09/07/14 13:10, Mark Nelson escribió:
On 07/09/2014 05:57 AM, Xabier Elkano wrote:
Hi,
I was doing some tests in my cluster with fio tool,
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:57:56 +0200 Xabier Elkano wrote:
El 09/07/14 16:53, Christian Balzer escribió:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 07:07:50 -0500 Mark Nelson wrote:
On 07/09/2014 06:52 AM, Xabier Elkano wrote:
El 09/07/14 13:10, Mark Nelson escribió:
On 07/09/2014 05:57 AM, Xabier Elkano wrote:
El 10/07/14 09:18, Christian Balzer escribió:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:57:56 +0200 Xabier Elkano wrote:
El 09/07/14 16:53, Christian Balzer escribió:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 07:07:50 -0500 Mark Nelson wrote:
On 07/09/2014 06:52 AM, Xabier Elkano wrote:
El 09/07/14 13:10, Mark Nelson escribió:
On
Hi,
Great.
All my OSD restart :
osdmap e438044: 36 osds: 36 up, 36 in
All PG page are active and some in recovery :
1604040/49575206 objects degraded (3.236%)
1780 active+clean
17 active+degraded+remapped+backfilling
61 active+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill
11 active+clean+scrubbing+deep
On 07/09/2014 09:53 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 07:07:50 -0500 Mark Nelson wrote:
On 07/09/2014 06:52 AM, Xabier Elkano wrote:
El 09/07/14 13:10, Mark Nelson escribió:
On 07/09/2014 05:57 AM, Xabier Elkano wrote:
Hi,
I was doing some tests in my cluster with fio tool,
On 07/10/2014 03:24 AM, Xabier Elkano wrote:
El 10/07/14 09:18, Christian Balzer escribió:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:57:56 +0200 Xabier Elkano wrote:
El 09/07/14 16:53, Christian Balzer escribió:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 07:07:50 -0500 Mark Nelson wrote:
On 07/09/2014 06:52 AM, Xabier Elkano
Hi,
RHEL7 repository works just as well. CentOS 7 is effectively a copy of
RHEL7 anyway. Packages for CentOS 7 wouldn't actually be any different.
Erik.
On 07/10/2014 06:14 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to known if a centos7 respository will be available soon ?
Or can I
Yeah, Ceph will never voluntarily reduce the redundancy. I believe
splitting the degraded state into separate wrongly placed and
degraded (reduced redundancy) states is currently on the menu for
the Giant release, but it's not been done yet.
That would greatly improve the accuracy of ceph's
Hi All,
There is a new bug-fix release of ceph-deploy, the easy deployment tool
for Ceph.
The full list of fixes for this release can be found in the changelog:
http://ceph.com/ceph-deploy/docs/changelog.html#id1
Make sure you update!
___
ceph-users
I can also say that after a recent upgrade to Firefly, I have experienced
massive uptick in scrub errors. The cluster was on cuttlefish for about a
year, and had maybe one or two scrub errors. After upgrading to Firefly,
we've probably seen 3 to 4 dozen in the last month or so (was getting 2-3 a
And actually just to follow-up, it does seem like there are some additional
smarts beyond just using the primary to overwrite the secondaries... Since
I captured md5 sums before and after the repair, I can say that in this
particular instance, the secondary copy was used to overwrite the primary.
Hi,
we try to set up a Webcluster, may somebody give a hint.
3 Webserver with Typo3
The Typo3-Cache on a central Storage with ceph.
May this be usefull within a vmware-cluster?
I need something different than a central NFS-Store. This is to slow.
Regards
Marc
OK - I found this information
(http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.user/4992):
When creating a bucket users can specify which placement target they
want to use with that specific bucket (by using the S3 create bucket
location constraints field, format is
Hi,
I am getting some troubles with the ceph mon stability.
Every couple of days mons die. I only see this error in the logs:
2014-07-08 14:24:53.056805 7f713bb5b700 -1 mon.cephmon02@1(peon) e2 ***
Got Signal Interrupt ***
2014-07-08 14:24:53.061795 7f713bb5b700 1 mon.cephmon02@1(peon) e2
Hi,
sorry to spam the mailing list,
but they are a inktank mellanox webinar in 10minutes,
and I don't have receive access since I have been registered yesterday (same
for my co-worker).
and the webinar mellanox contact email (conta...@mellanox.com), does not
exist
Maybe somebody from
I can also confirm that after upgrading to firefly both of our clusters (test
and live) were going from 0 scrub errors each for about 6 Month to about 9-12
per week...
This also makes me kind of nervous, since as far as I know everything ceph pg
repair does, is to copy the primary object to all
Hello to all,
I was wondering is it possible to place different pools on different
OSDs, but using only two physical servers?
I was thinking about this: http://tinypic.com/r/30tgt8l/8
I would like to use osd.0 and osd.1 for Cinder/RBD pool, and osd.2 and
osd.3 for Nova instances. I was
The same here...Neither do I or my colleagues
G.
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:55:22 +0200 (CEST), Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
Hi,
sorry to spam the mailing list,
but they are a inktank mellanox webinar in 10minutes,
and I don't have receive access since I have been registered
yesterday (same for my
Ok, sorry, we have finally receive the login a bit late.
Sorry again to have spam the mailing list
- Mail original -
De: Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com
À: ceph-users ceph-us...@ceph.com
Envoyé: Jeudi 10 Juillet 2014 16:55:22
Objet: [ceph-users] inktank-mellanox webinar access
On Thursday, July 10, 2014, Erik Logtenberg e...@logtenberg.eu wrote:
Yeah, Ceph will never voluntarily reduce the redundancy. I believe
splitting the degraded state into separate wrongly placed and
degraded (reduced redundancy) states is currently on the menu for
the Giant release, but
Hi,
I've just upgraded a ceph cluster from Ubuntu 12.04 with 0.72.1 to Ubuntu
14.04 with 0.80.1.
I've noticed that the log rotation doesn't appear to work correctly.
The OSD's are just not logging to the current ceph-osd-X.log file.
If I restart the OSD's or run service ceph-osd reload id=X,
That makes two of us...
G.
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:12:08 +0200 (CEST), Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
Ok, sorry, we have finally receive the login a bit late.
Sorry again to have spam the mailing list
- Mail original -
De: Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com
À: ceph-users
Hi there
Recently I got a problem triggered by rebooting ceph nodes, which eventually
wound up by rebuilding from ground up. A too-long-don't-read question here
is: is there suggested best practices for online/offline ceph node?
Following the official ceph doc, I set up a 4 node ceph (firefly)
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Joe Hewitt joe.z.hew...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there
Recently I got a problem triggered by rebooting ceph nodes, which eventually
wound up by rebuilding from ground up. A too-long-don't-read question here
is: is there suggested best practices for online/offline
Can you attach your ceph.conf for your osds?
-Sam
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Christian Eichelmann
christian.eichelm...@1und1.de wrote:
I can also confirm that after upgrading to firefly both of our clusters
(test and live) were going from 0 scrub errors each for about 6 Month to
about
I've a basic related question re: Firefly operation - would appreciate any
insights:
With three replicas, if checksum inconsistencies across replicas are found
during deep-scrub then:
a. does the majority win or is the primary always the winner and used
to overwrite the secondaries
Repair I think will tend to choose the copy with the lowest osd number
which is not obviously corrupted. Even with three replicas, it does
not do any kind of voting at this time.
-Sam
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Chahal, Sudip sudip.cha...@intel.com wrote:
I've a basic related question re:
Thanks - so it appears that the advantage of the 3rd replica (relative to 2
replicas) has to do much more with recovering from two concurrent OSD failures
than with inconsistencies found during deep scrub - would you agree?
Re: repair - do you mean the repair process during deep scrub - if
Greetings,
Just a follow up on my original issue. =ceph pg repair ...= fixed the
problem. However, today I got another inconsistent pg. It's interesting to
me that this second error is in the same rbd image and appears to be
close to the previously inconsistent pg. (Even more fun, osd.5 was the
I fixed this issue by reformatting all of the OSDs. I changed the mkfs
options from
[osd]
osd mkfs type = xfs
osd mkfs options xfs = -l size=1024m -n size=64k -i size=2048 -s size=4096
to
[osd]
osd mkfs type = xfs
osd mkfs options xfs = -s size=4096
(I have a mix of 512 and 4k sector
Hi,
I've just upgraded a ceph cluster from Ubuntu 12.04 with 0.73.1 to Ubuntu
14.04 with 0.80.1.
I've noticed that the log rotation doesn't appear to work correctly.
The OSD's are just not logging to the current ceph-osd-X.log file.
If I restart the OSD's, they start logging, but then overnight,
It could be an indication of a problem on osd 5, but the timing is
worrying. Can you attach your ceph.conf? Have there been any osds
going down, new osds added, anything to cause recovery? Anything in
dmesg to indicate an fs problem? Have you recently changed any
settings?
-Sam
On Thu, Jul
Hi,
I prefer to use bcache or other likely local write back cache on SSD since
it is only related to local HDDs. It think, it will reduce the risk of
error on cache flushing comparing to CEPH Cache Tiering which still using
clustering network on flushing. After the data has been written to the
Hi,
I prefer to use bCache or other likely local write back cache on SSD since
it is only related to local HDDs. It think, it will reduce the risk of
error on cache flushing comparing to CEPH Cache Tiering which still using
clustering network on flushing. After the data has been written to the
I upgraded my cluster to .80.1-2 (CentOS). My mount command just freezes
and outputs an error:
mount.ceph 192.168.0.14,192.168.0.15,192.168.0.16:/ /us-west01 -o
name=chefwks01,secret=`ceph-authtool -p -n client.admin
/etc/ceph/us-west01.client.admin.keyring`
mount error 5 = Input/output error
Have you made any other changes after the upgrade? (Like adjusting
tunables, or creating EC pools?)
See if there is anything in 'dmesg' output.
sage
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Joshua McClintock wrote:
I upgraded my cluster to .80.1-2 (CentOS). My mount command just freezes
and outputs an error:
Hi Craig,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:09:51PM -0700, Craig Lewis wrote:
I fixed this issue by reformatting all of the OSDs. I changed the mkfs
options from
[osd]
osd mkfs type = xfs
osd mkfs options xfs = -l size=1024m -n size=64k -i size=2048 -s size=4096
to
[osd]
osd mkfs type
Hi,
I try to create a qemu image, but got failed.
ceph@ceph:~/my-cluster$ qemu-img create -f rbd rbd:rbd/qemu 2G
Formatting 'rbd:rbd/qemu', fmt=rbd size=2147483648 cluster_size=0
qemu-img: error connecting
qemu-img: rbd:rbd/qemu: error while creating rbd: Input/output error
Can you tell what's
That is CEPH_FEATURE_CRUSH_V2. Can you attach teh output of
ceph osd crush dump
Thanks!
sage
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Joshua McClintock wrote:
Yes, I change some of the mount options on my osds (xfs mount options), but
I think this may be the answer from dmesg, sorta looks like a version
[root@chefwks01 ~]# ceph --cluster us-west01 osd crush dump
{ devices: [
{ id: 0,
name: osd.0},
{ id: 1,
name: osd.1},
{ id: 2,
name: osd.2},
{ id: 3,
name: osd.3},
{ id: 4,
name: osd.4}],
40 matches
Mail list logo
