Hi Ken,
Thank you, I will update my repo and continue my test.
- Songbo
On 15/9/23 上午10:50, Ken Dreyer wrote:
Hi Songbo, It's been removed from Ansible now:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-cm-ansible/pull/137
- Ken
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:33 PM, wangsongbo wrote:
Hi Ken,
Thanks
Hi Songbo, It's been removed from Ansible now:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-cm-ansible/pull/137
- Ken
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:33 PM, wangsongbo wrote:
> Hi Ken,
> Thanks for your reply. But in the ceph-cm-ansible project scheduled by
> teuthology, "ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras" is in used
Hi Brad,
This occurred on a system under moderate load - has not happened since and
I do not know how to reproduce.
Thank you,
Alex
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Brad Hubbard wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: "Alex Gorbachev"
> > To: "ceph-users"
> > Sent: Wednesday, 9 Sep
Hi Ken,
Thanks for your reply. But in the ceph-cm-ansible project scheduled
by teuthology, "ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras" is in used now, such as
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph,
qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph etc.
Any new releases will be provided ?
On 15/9/22 下午10:24, Ke
On 09/22/2015 05:22 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After the recent changes in the Ceph website the IPv6 connectivity got lost.
>>
>> www.ceph.com
>> docs.ceph.com
>> download.ceph.com
>> git.ceph.com
>>
>> The problem I'm now facing with a couple
- Original Message -
> From: "Alex Gorbachev"
> To: "ceph-users"
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 September, 2015 6:38:50 AM
> Subject: [ceph-users] OSD crash
> Hello,
> We have run into an OSD crash this weekend with the following dump. Please
> advise what this could be.
Hello Alex,
As you kn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
This is IPoIB and we have the MTU set to 64K. There was some issues
pinging hosts with "No buffer space available" (hosts are currently
configured for 4GB to test SSD caching rather than page cache). I
found that MTU under 32K worked reliable for pin
I wrote some scripts based on this page.
https://ceph.com/dev-notes/incremental-snapshots-with-rbd/ [1]
We export the whole image to an external array, then export daily diffs.
The array is then rotated weekly.
Even with "--rbd-concurrent-management-ops 20" it is a very slow
export/import
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Samuel Just wrote:
> I looked at the logs, it looks like there was a 53 second delay
> between when osd.17 started sending the osd_repop message and when
> osd.13 started reading it, which is pretty weird. Sage, didn't we
> once see a kernel issue which caused some messages to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
4.2.0-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64
- -
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Samuel Just wrote:
> I looked at the
I looked at the logs, it looks like there was a 53 second delay
between when osd.17 started sending the osd_repop message and when
osd.13 started reading it, which is pretty weird. Sage, didn't we
once see a kernel issue which caused some messages to be mysteriously
delayed for many 10s of seconds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
OK, looping in ceph-devel to see if I can get some more eyes. I've
extracted what I think are important entries from the logs for the
first blocked request. NTP is running all the servers so the logs
should be close in terms of time. Logs for 12:50 t
I had the same problem yesterday. The date has to be rfc 822 (no colons)
but the pattern ("EEE, dd MMM HH:mm:ss z") at
com.amazonaws.util.DateUtils#L55 has a "z" which can give "GMT" but also
"+00:00". I couldn't figure out yet why I always get "+00:00" with my
recent project but not with
Hey cephers,
All of the planned Ceph Days through the end of the year are now live:
http://ceph.com/cephdays/
16 Oct - Shanghai (hosted by Intel)
22 Oct - Tokyo (hosted by Cyber Agent)
05 Nov - Melbourne (hosted by Monash University)
Please sign up as soon as you are able to any of the events y
> > when you enable the "exclusive-lock" feature, only one RBD client is able
> > to modify the image while the lock is held.
>
> means
>
> rbd_lock_exclusive
>
> > However, that won't stop other RBD clients from *requesting* that
> > maintenance operations be performed on the image (e.g. snap
> when you enable the "exclusive-lock" feature, only one RBD client is able to
> modify the image while the lock is held.
means
rbd_lock_exclusive
> However, that won't stop other RBD clients from *requesting* that maintenance
> operations be performed on the image (e.g. snapshot, resize).
> On 22/09/15 17:46, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> > As a background, I believe LTTng-UST is disabled for RHEL7 in the Ceph
> > project only due to the fact that EPEL 7 doesn't provide the required
> > packages [1].
>
> interesting. so basically our program might only work on RHEL7 by accident!!
>
It'
On 22/09/15 17:46, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> As a background, I believe LTTng-UST is disabled for RHEL7 in the Ceph
> project only due to the fact that EPEL 7 doesn't provide the required
> packages [1].
interesting. so basically our program might only work on RHEL7 by accident!!
We got the EL
As a background, I believe LTTng-UST is disabled for RHEL7 in the Ceph project
only due to the fact that EPEL 7 doesn't provide the required packages [1].
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235461
--
Jason Dillaman
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Mansfield"
> To: c
On 18/09/15 17:15, Paul Mansfield wrote:
> LTTng-UST: Error (-17) while registering tracepoint probe. Duplicate
> registration of tracepoint probes having the same name is not allowed.
> /bin/sh: line 1: 61001 Aborted (core dumped) ./$test
I have made an interesting discovery. I wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
What does `ceph-disk list` report for the partition? You may need to
run `partprobe /dev/sdb`. If ceph-disk list shows prepared, then just
run `ceph-disk activate /dev/sdb1`.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904
Hey cephers,
Don't forget that this Thursday is the monthly Ceph Tech Talk
(starting @ 2p EDT instead of 1p). This month Brent Compton will be
discussing the particulars of building a Ceph reference architecture.
Tune in on Thurs for details.
http://ceph.com/ceph-tech-talks/
If you have questio
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Is there some way to tell in the logs that this is happening?
You can search for the (mangled) name _split_collection
> I'm not
> seeing much I/O, CPU usage during these times. Is there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Is there some way to tell in the logs that this is happening? I'm not
seeing much I/O, CPU usage during these times. Is there some way to
prevent the splitting? Is there a negative side effect to doing so?
We've had I/O block for over 900 seconds and
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Songbo Wang wrote:
> Hi, all,
> Since the last week‘s attack, “ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras” can be
> opened never, but where can I get the releases of ceph-extra now?
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> WangSongbo
>
The packages in "ceph-extras" were old and subje
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I'm starting to wonder if this has to do with some OSDs getting full
> or the 0.94.3 code. Earlier this afternoon, I cleared out my test
> cluster so there was no pools. I created anew r
http://pastebin.com/BUm61Bbf
On our cluster that hosts mainly RBDs, we have an OSD fail, the OSD was
replaced. During the rebalance with the new OSD, another OSD failed. That
OSD was replaced during the continuing rebalance. Now that the dust has
settled most of are RBDs are hanging on PGs and
Hi,
We've been considering periodically backing up rbds from ceph to a
different storage backend, just in case. I've thought of a few ways this
could be possible, but I am curious if anybody on this list is currently
doing that.
Are you currently backing up data that is contained in ceph? What do
You can run the program under 'gdb' with a breakpoint on the 'abort' function
to catch the program's abnormal exit. Assuming you have debug symbols
installed, you should hopefully be able to see which probe is being
re-registered.
--
Jason Dillaman
- Original Message -
> From: "Pa
The naming of the "exclusive-lock" feature probably implies too much compared
to what it actually does. In reality, when you enable the "exclusive-lock"
feature, only one RBD client is able to modify the image while the lock is
held. However, that won't stop other RBD clients from *requesting*
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Paul Mansfield
wrote:
> On 18/09/15 15:48, Alfredo Deza wrote:
>> The new locations are in: http://packages.ceph.com/
>>
>> ceph-extras should no longer be needed.
>
> the DNS seems to be broken with no "packages" resource record
Hi Paul. I am sorry, it seems I ga
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After the recent changes in the Ceph website the IPv6 connectivity got lost.
>
> www.ceph.com
> docs.ceph.com
> download.ceph.com
> git.ceph.com
>
> The problem I'm now facing with a couple of systems is that they can't
> download the Pack
Hi guys,
when creating an rbd with feature "exclusive-lock" (and object-map, fast-diff,
..), do I have to pass any special
arguments to qemu to activate it?
How does this feature work with resize, snapshot creation, etc.? Form my work
on ceph-ruby I know you have to call
"rbd_open" and then pas
On 18/09/15 15:48, Alfredo Deza wrote:
> The new locations are in: http://packages.ceph.com/
>
> ceph-extras should no longer be needed.
the DNS seems to be broken with no "packages" resource record
$ dig packages.ceph.com @8.8.8.8
; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-9ubuntu0.3-Ubuntu <<>> packages.ceph.com @8.8.
Thanks. I read the notes about mixing dynamic and static libraries, but
at the moment I can't see why that affects me as I'm not doing anything
clever with linking, my makefile simply has "-lrados -lradosstriper" in
it, and I'm using gcc in a standard way.
If I used "ldd" and "nm" on the .o and e
I encountered the same issue in my setup (with an AWS SDK client) and
on further investigation found that 'rgw print continue' was set to
false for a civetweb driven rgw.
Updated http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12640
Giridhar
--
Giridhar Yasa | Flipkart Engineering | http://www.flipkart.com/
On
I encountered the same issue in my setup (with an AWS SDK client) and on
further investigation found that 'rgw print continue' was set to false for
a civetweb driven rgw.
Updated http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12640
Giridhar
--
Giridhar Yasa | Flipkart Engineering | http://www.flipkart.com/
On
Hi, everybody
When I use the ceph-disk utility to prepare the OSD,
I executed the following orders:
sudo ceph-disk prepare --cluster ceph --cluster-uuid
aae7140c-7ee2-49f2-b8de-4c74f6f8651a --fs-type xfs /dev/sdb1
but I got:
2015-09-22 16:55:59.683674 7f2f3c97e7c0 -1 did not load config fi
Hi, all,
Since the last week‘s attack, “ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras” can
be opened never, but where can I get the releases of ceph-extra now?
Thanks and Regards,
WangSongbo
2015-09-18 0:29 GMT+08:00 Sage Weil :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Last week, Red Hat in
Hi,
http://ceph.com/maven/ no longer works.
This maven repository was used to host the rados-java bindings, but also
the cephfs java bindings.
Can we put this location back up again?
Wido
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://li
Hi,
After the recent changes in the Ceph website the IPv6 connectivity got lost.
www.ceph.com
docs.ceph.com
download.ceph.com
git.ceph.com
The problem I'm now facing with a couple of systems is that they can't
download the Package signing key from git.ceph.com or anything from
download.ceph.com
Hi!
It will be difficult to evenly distribute data with such difference in disk
sizes.
You can adjust a weight of most filled up ODSs with command
#ceph osd reweight
where new weight is a float in range 0.0-1.0. When you lower the weight
of OSD, some PG will move from it to another location,
42 matches
Mail list logo
