Re: [ceph-users] Ceph + VMware + Single Thread Performance

Hello, On Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:57:40 +0100 Nick Fisk wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of > > Christian Balzer > > Sent: 21 August 2016 09:32 > > To: ceph-users > > Subject: Re:

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph repository IP block

This is going to be a challenge ​/Vlad On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > Op 21 augustus 2016 om 10:26 schreef "Brian ::" : > > > > > > If you point at the eu.ceph.com > > > > ceph.apt-get.eu has address 185.27.175.43 > > > >

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph + VMware + Single Thread Performance

From: Alex Gorbachev [mailto:a...@iss-integration.com] Sent: 21 August 2016 15:27 To: Wilhelm Redbrake Cc: n...@fisk.me.uk; Horace Ng ; ceph-users Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph + VMware + Single Thread Performance On Sunday,

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph + VMware + Single Thread Performance

On Sunday, August 21, 2016, Wilhelm Redbrake wrote: > Hi Nick, > i understand all of your technical improvements. > But: why do you Not use a simple for example Areca Raid Controller with 8 > gb Cache and Bbu ontop in every ceph node. > Configure n Times RAID 0 on the Controller

Re: [ceph-users] Is anyone seeing iissues with task_numa_find_cpu?

Yeah, switched to 4.7 recently and no issues so far. 2016-08-21 6:09 GMT+03:00 Alex Gorbachev : > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Alex Gorbachev > wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Василий Ангапов wrote: >>>

Re: [ceph-users] Recover Data from Deleted RBD Volume

As a closure I would like to thank all people who contributed with their knowledge in my problem although the final decision was not to try any sort of recovery since the effort required would have been tremendous with unambiguous results (to say at least). Jason, Ilya, Brad, David, George,

[ceph-users] Ceph pool snapshots

Hi, [ceph@ceph1 my-cluster]$ ceph -v ceph version 10.2.2 (45107e21c568dd033c2f0a3107dec8f0b0e58374) [ceph@ceph1 my-cluster]$ rados -p mypool ls hello.txt [ceph@ceph1 my-cluster]$ rados -p mypool mksnap snap01 created pool mypool snap snap01 [ceph@ceph1 my-cluster]$ rados -p mypool lssnap 5 snap01

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph repository IP block

> Op 21 augustus 2016 om 10:26 schreef "Brian ::" : > > > If you point at the eu.ceph.com > > ceph.apt-get.eu has address 185.27.175.43 > > ceph.apt-get.eu has IPv6 address 2a00:f10:121:400:48c:baff:fe00:477 > Yes, however, keep in mind that IPs might change without notice.

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph + VMware + Single Thread Performance

> -Original Message- > From: Wilhelm Redbrake [mailto:w...@globe.de] > Sent: 21 August 2016 09:34 > To: n...@fisk.me.uk > Cc: Alex Gorbachev ; Horace Ng ; > ceph-users > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph + VMware +

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph + VMware + Single Thread Performance

Hello, On Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:16:33 +0100 Brian :: wrote: > Hi Nick > > Interested in this comment - "-Dual sockets are probably bad and will > impact performance." > > Have you got real world experience of this being the case? > Well, Nick wrote "probably". Dual sockets and thus NUMA, the

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph repository IP block

If you point at the eu.ceph.com ceph.apt-get.eu has address 185.27.175.43 ceph.apt-get.eu has IPv6 address 2a00:f10:121:400:48c:baff:fe00:477 On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Vlad Blando wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I will be installing Ceph behind a very restrictive firewall

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph + VMware + Single Thread Performance

Hi Nick Interested in this comment - "-Dual sockets are probably bad and will impact performance." Have you got real world experience of this being the case? Thanks - B On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Nick Fisk wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Alex Gorbachev

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph + VMware + Single Thread Performance

> -Original Message- > From: Alex Gorbachev [mailto:a...@iss-integration.com] > Sent: 21 August 2016 04:15 > To: Nick Fisk > Cc: w...@globe.de; Horace Ng ; ceph-users > > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph + VMware + Single