Hi Denes Dolhay,
This is error when I run command: ceph-deploy mon create-initial
[ceph_deploy.mon][INFO ] mon.ceph-node1 monitor has reached quorum!
[ceph_deploy.mon][INFO ] all initial monitors are running and have formed
quorum
[ceph_deploy.mon][INFO ] Running gatherkeys...
[ceph_deploy.gath
Hm, no necessarily directly related to your performance problem,
however: These SSDs have a listed endurance of 72TB total data written
- over a 5 year period that's 40GB a day or approx 0.04 DWPD. Given
that you run the journal for each OSD on the same disk, that's
effectively at most 0.02 DWPD (a
The long running functionality appears to be related to clear_temp_objects();
from OSD.cc called from init().
What is this functionality intended to do? Is it required to be run on every
OSD startup? Any configuration settings that would help speed this up?
---
Would be nice to see your output of:
rados bench -p rbd 60 write --no-cleanup -t 56 -b 4096 -o 1M
Total time run: 60.005452
Total writes made: 438295
Write size: 4096
Object size: 1048576
Bandwidth (MB/sec): 28.5322
Stddev Bandwidth: 0.514721
Max ban
I wish the firmware update will fix things for you.
Regarding monitoring: if your tool is able to record disk busy%, iops,
throughout then you do not need to run atop.
I still highly recommend you run the fio SSD test for sync writes:
https://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/10/10/ceph-how-to-test-
Thanks all for offering input
I believe i worked it out :D you can set permissions using s3cmd
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:20 AM, nigel davies wrote:
> Thanks i spotted this, when i run the example i get
> ERROR: S3 error: 400 (InvalidArgument)
>
> I found that bucket link will, link my buckets
Thanks John. It has been up for a few hours now, and I am slowly adding
more workload to it over time, just so I can see what id going on better.
I was wondering, since this object is used to delete data, if there was
a chance that deleting data from the system could cause it to be used
and t
Hi,
If you ssh to ceph-node1, what are the rights, owner, group, content of
/etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring ?
[you should mask out the key, just show us that it is there]
On 10/26/2017 05:41 PM, GiangCoi Mr wrote:
Hi Denes.
I created with command: ceph-deploy new ceph-node1
Sent from m
Hi Denes.
I created with command: ceph-deploy new ceph-node1
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 26, 2017, at 10:34 PM, Denes Dolhay wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Did you to create a cluster first?
>
> ceph-deploy new {initial-monitor-node(s)}
>
> Cheers,
> Denes.
>> On 10/26/2017 05:25 PM, GiangCoi Mr wrote:
>>
Hi,
Did you to create a cluster first?
ceph-deploy new {initial-monitor-node(s)} Cheers, Denes.
On 10/26/2017 05:25 PM, GiangCoi Mr wrote:
Dear Alan Johnson
I install with command: ceph-deploy install ceph-node1 —no-adjust-repos. When
install success, I run command: ceph-deploy mon ceph-nod
Dear Alan Johnson
I install with command: ceph-deploy install ceph-node1 —no-adjust-repos. When
install success, I run command: ceph-deploy mon ceph-node1, it’s error because
it didn’t find file ceph.client.admin.keyring. So how I make permission for
this file?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 26,
If using defaults try
chmod +r /etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring
-Original Message-
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
GiangCoi Mr
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 11:09 AM
To: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: [ceph-users] Install Ceph on Fedora 26
H
Hi all
I am installing ceph luminous on fedora 26, I installed ceph luminous success
but when I install ceph mon, it’s error: it doesn’t find client.admin.keyring.
How I can fix it, Thank so much
Regard,
GiangLT
Sent from my iPhone
___
ceph-users mai
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Maged Mokhtar wrote:
> It depends on what stage you are in:
> in production, probably the best thing is to setup a monitoring tool
> (collectd/grahite/prometheus/grafana) to monitor both ceph stats as well
> as resource load. This will, among other things, show yo
Hey Cephers,
This is just a friendly reminder that the next Ceph Developer Montly
meeting is coming up:
http://wiki.ceph.com/Planning
If you have work that you're doing that it a feature work, significant
backports, or anything you would like to discuss with the core team,
please add it to the
Hey Cephers,
Sorry for the short notice, but the Ceph Tech Talk for October
(scheduled for today) has been canceled.
Kindest regards,
Leo
--
Leonardo Vaz
Ceph Community Manager
Open Source and Standards Team
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lis
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Daniel Davidson
wrote:
> And at the risk of bombing the mailing list, I can also see that the
> stray7_head omapkey is not being recreated:
> rados -p igbhome_data listomapkeys 100.
> stray0_head
> stray1_head
> stray2_head
> stray3_head
> stray4_head
> st
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Haomai Wang wrote:
> in our test, lz4 is better than snappy
Let's switch the default then?
sage
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Am 25.10.2017 um 21:54 schrieb Sage Weil:
> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> in the lumious release notes is stated that zstd is not supported by
> >> bluestor due to performance
And at the risk of bombing the mailing list, I can also see that the
stray7_head omapkey is not being recreated:
rados -p igbhome_data listomapkeys 100.
stray0_head
stray1_head
stray2_head
stray3_head
stray4_head
stray5_head
stray6_head
stray8_head
stray9_head
On 10/26/2017 05:08 AM, D
I increased the logging of the mds to try and get some more
information. I think the relevant lines are:
2017-10-26 05:03:17.661683 7f1c598a6700 0 mds.0.cache.dir(607) _fetched
missing object for [dir 607 ~mds0/stray7/ [2,head] auth v=108918871
cv=0/0 ap=1+0+0 state=1610645632 f(v1 m2017-10-
Setting rgw_enable_usage_log is not even helping. I get a lot of reads still,
caused by the calls in my previous email..
Met vriendelijke groeten,
--
Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
T: 0
Thanks i spotted this, when i run the example i get
ERROR: S3 error: 400 (InvalidArgument)
I found that bucket link will, link my buckets to different users (what is
what i am kind of after)
But i also link to make sure, if an new user was added. they have no access
to any buckets until i allow
nigel davies writes:
> I am fallowing a guide at the mo.
>
> But I believe it's RWG users
We have support for aws like bucket policies,
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/bucketpolicy/
Some amount of permissions can also be controlled by acls
>
> On 25 Oct 2017 5:29 pm, "David Turner" wr
Hello,
while trying to optimize a ceph cluster running jewel i get the
following output:
2017-10-26 10:43:27,615 argv = optimize --crushmap
/home/spriebe/ceph.report --out-path /home/spriebe/optimized.crush
--pool 5 --pool=5 --choose-args=5 --replication-count=3 --pg-num=4096
--pgp-num=4096 --rule
if you were following this page:
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/jewel/rados/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-pg/
then there is normally hours of troubleshooting in the following
paragraph, before finally admitting defeat and marking the object as lost:
"It is possible that there are other locations
26 matches
Mail list logo