Re: [ceph-users] Ceph pg repair clone_missing?

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 6:46 PM Marc Roos wrote: > > > > >> > >> I was following the thread where you adviced on this pg repair > >> > >> I ran these rados 'list-inconsistent-obj'/'rados > >> list-inconsistent-snapset' and have output on the snapset. I tried > to > >> extrapolate your

Re: [ceph-users] NFS

Thanks Matt! Really useful configs. I am still on luminous, so I can forget about this now :( I will try when I am nautilus, I have already updated my configuration. However it is interesting that in the configuration nowhere the tenant is specified, so I guess that is being extracted from

Re: [ceph-users] NFS

"Path" is either "/" to indicate the top of the tree, or a bucket name to indicate a limited export for a single bucket. It's not related to the user at all. On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:34 AM Marc Roos wrote: > > > How should a multi tenant RGW config look like, I am not able get this > working:

Re: [ceph-users] NFS

Hi Mark, Here's an example that should work--userx and usery are RGW users created in different tenants, like so: radosgw-admin --tenant tnt1 --uid userx --display-name "tnt1-userx" \ --access_key "userxacc" --secret "test123" user create radosgw-admin --tenant tnt2 --uid usery

Re: [ceph-users] NFS

We have tried running nfs-ganesha (2.7 - 2.8.1) with FSAL_CEPH backed by a Nautilus CephFS. Performance when doing metadata operations (ie anything with small files) is very slow. On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:34 AM Marc Roos wrote: > > > How should a multi tenant RGW config look like, I am not able

Re: [ceph-users] NFS

How should a multi tenant RGW config look like, I am not able get this working: EXPORT { Export_ID=301; Path = "test:test3"; #Path = "/"; Pseudo = "/rgwtester"; Protocols = 4; FSAL { Name = RGW; User_Id = "test$tester1";

Re: [ceph-users] Unexpected increase in the memory usage of OSDs

And, just as unexpectedly, things have returned to normal overnight https://icecube.wisc.edu/~vbrik/graph-1.png The change seems to have coincided with the beginning of Rados Gateway activity (before, it was essentially zero). I can see nothing in the logs that would explain what happened

Re: [ceph-users] NFS

RGW NFS can support any NFS style of authentication, but users will have the RGW access of their nfs-ganesha export. You can create exports with disjoint privileges, and since recent L, N, RGW tenants. Matt On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:31 AM Marc Roos wrote: > > I think you can run into problems

Re: [ceph-users] NFS

So, Ganesha is an NFS gateway, living in userspace. It provides access via NFS (for any NFS client) to a number of clustered storage systems, or to local filesystems on it's host. It can run on any system that has access to the cluster (ceph in this case). One Ganesha instance can serve quite a

Re: [ceph-users] rgw: multisite support

Thank you. Do we have a quick document to do this migration? Thanks Swami On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 4:38 PM Paul Emmerich wrote: > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:03 PM M Ranga Swami Reddy > wrote: > > > > Below url says: "Switching from a standalone deployment to a multi-site > replicated deployment

Re: [ceph-users] rgw: multisite support

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:03 PM M Ranga Swami Reddy wrote: > > Below url says: "Switching from a standalone deployment to a multi-site > replicated deployment is not supported. > https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/charm-deployment-guide/latest/app-rgw-multisite.html this is wrong,

Re: [ceph-users] ceph pg repair fails...?

on both pg's [root@ceph-n10 ~]# zgrep "2.2a7" /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.83.log* /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.83.log-20191002.gz:2019-10-01 07:19:47.060 7f9adab4b700 -1 log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : 2.2a7 repair 11 errors, 0 fixed /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.83.log-20191003.gz:2019-10-02 09

Re: [ceph-users] rgw: multisite support

Below url says: "Switching from a standalone deployment to a multi-site replicated deployment is not supported. https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/charm-deployment-guide/latest/app-rgw-multisite.html Please advise. On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:28 PM M Ranga Swami Reddy wrote: > Hi, >

[ceph-users] rgw: multisite support

Hi, Iam using the 2 ceph clusters in diff DCs (away by 500 KM) with ceph 12.2.11 version. Now, I want to setup rgw multisite using the above 2 ceph clusters. is it possible? if yes, please share good document to do the same. Thanks Swami ___ ceph-users

Re: [ceph-users] rgw S3 lifecycle cannot keep up

Thank you Robin. Looking at the video it doesn't seem like a fix is anywhere near ready. Am I correct in concluding that Ceph is not the right tool for my use-case? Cheers, Christian On Oct 3 2019, at 6:07 am, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:48:40PM +0200, Christian

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph pg repair clone_missing?

> >> >> I was following the thread where you adviced on this pg repair >> >> I ran these rados 'list-inconsistent-obj'/'rados >> list-inconsistent-snapset' and have output on the snapset. I tried to >> extrapolate your comment on the data/omap_digest_mismatch_info onto my >>

[ceph-users] Tiering Dirty Objects

Hi, Is there any way to query the list of dirty objects inside tier/hot pool? I just know how to see the number of them per pool. Best regards, ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] hanging/stopped recovery/rebalance in Nautilus

Hi,I often observed now that the recovery/rebalance in Nautilus starts quite fast but gets extremely slow (2-3 objects/s) even if there are like 20 OSDs involved. Right now I am moving (reweighted to 0) 16x8TB disks, it's running since 4 days and since 12h it's kind of stuck now at   cluster: