I dont think this has anything to do with CephFS, the mon crashes for same
reason even without the mds running.I have still the old rocksdb files but they
had a corruption issue, not sure if that's easier to fix, there havent been any
changes on the cluster in between.
This is a disaster
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:58 AM Vladimir Brik <
vladimir.b...@icecube.wisc.edu> wrote:
> Best I can tell, automatic cache sizing is enabled and all related
> settings are at their default values.
>
> Looking through cache tunables, I came across
> osd_memory_expected_fragmentation, which the docs
Awesome! Sorry it took so long.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:44 AM Marc Roos wrote:
>
>
> Brad, many thanks!!! My cluster has finally HEALTH_OK af 1,5 year or so!
> :)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> Subject: Re: Ceph pg repair clone_missing?
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:09 PM Marc Roos
>
Looks like this bug: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/41148
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 1:15 PM David C wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel
>
> Thanks for looking into this. I hadn't installed ceph-debuginfo, here's the
> bt with line numbers:
>
> #0 operator uint64_t (this=0x10) at
>
Hi Daniel
Thanks for looking into this. I hadn't installed ceph-debuginfo, here's the
bt with line numbers:
#0 operator uint64_t (this=0x10) at
/usr/src/debug/ceph-14.2.2/src/include/object.h:123
#1 Client::fill_statx (this=this@entry=0x274b980, in=0x0, mask=mask@entry=341,
Best I can tell, automatic cache sizing is enabled and all related
settings are at their default values.
Looking through cache tunables, I came across
osd_memory_expected_fragmentation, which the docs define as "estimate
the percent of memory fragmentation". What's the formula to compute
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:11 PM Philippe D'Anjou
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> unfortunately it's single mon, because we had major outage on this cluster
> and it's just being used to copy off data now. We werent able to add more
> mons because once a second mon was added it crashed the first one (there's a
Thanks - yeah jewel is old But i meant to say nautilus and not luminous.
The first option probably wont work for me. Since both sides are active and the
application1 needs to write in both places as http://application1.something.com.
The 2nd one in theory should work. I'm using haproxy and it
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 7:20 AM Vladimir Brik
wrote:
>
> > Do you have statistics on the size of the OSDMaps or count of them
> > which were being maintained by the OSDs?
> No, I don't think so. How can I find this information?
Hmm I don't know if we directly expose the size of maps. There are
Boy, Jewel is pretty old. Even Luminous is getting up there. There have been a
lot of multisite improvements in Mimic and now Nautilus, so you might want to
consider upgrading all the way to 14.2.4.
Anyway, the way we solve this is by giving each zone a different name (eg
Hello,
I have a question about multi site configuration. I have 2 clusters configured
in a single realm and zonegroup. One cluster is the master zone and the other
the slave. Lets assume the first cluster can be reached at
http://application1.something.com and the 2nd one is
Brad, many thanks!!! My cluster has finally HEALTH_OK af 1,5 year or so!
:)
-Original Message-
Subject: Re: Ceph pg repair clone_missing?
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:09 PM Marc Roos
wrote:
>
> >
> >Try something like the following on each OSD that holds a copy of
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
