Re: [ceph-users] Ceph pool EC with overwrite enabled

Hi, I look the newbie problem rs , i've made a little confusion when I read the ec_pool in community document. Thanks . On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 1:08 AM huang jun wrote: > try: rbd create backup2/teste --size 5T --data-pool ec_pool > > Fabio Abreu 于2019年7月5日周五 上午1:49写道： > &

[ceph-users] Ceph pool EC with overwrite enabled

in section 'global' redefined 2019-07-03 17:27:33.721593 7f12c3fff700 -1 librbd::image::CreateRequest: 0x560f2f0db0a0 handle_add_image_to_directory: error adding image to directory: (95) Operation not supported rbd: create error: (95) Operation not supported Regards, Fabio Abreu Reis ht

[ceph-users] ceph ansible deploy lvm advanced

Hi Everybody, I starting a new lab environment with ceph ansible , bluestore and lvm advanced deployment. Which size configuration is recommend to set data ,journal wal and db lvm ? Someone had configured in lvm adavanced deploy ? Regards, Fabio -- Atenciosamente, Fabio Abreu Reis http

Re: [ceph-users] priorize degraged objects than misplaced

,47,38] 96 [154]154 If I compare with a good one we look this : up_primary acting acting_primary 85 [85,102,143]85 The problematic pg scenario is a normal thing ? Regards, Fabio Abreu On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:01 AM David Turner wrote: > Cep

Re: [ceph-users] problems with pg down

2019-03-10 17:36:17.655814 7f1992173700 0 -- 172.16.184.90:6800/589935 >> 172.16.184.91:6833/316673 pipe(0x555be7740800 sd=527 :6800 s=0 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0 c=0x555be6720580).accept connect_seq 0 vs existing 0 state wait Regards, Fabio Abreu On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 3:20 PM Darius Kasparavičius wrote:

[ceph-users] problems with pg down

recovery 7484106/317878237 objects misplaced (2.354%) recovery 29/105009626 unfoun -- Regards, Fabio Abreu Reis http://fajlinux.com.br *Tel : *+55 21 98244-0161 *Skype : *fabioabreureis ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ce

[ceph-users] priorize degraged objects than misplaced

HI Everybody, I have a doubt about degraded objects in the Jewel 10.2.7 version, can I priorize the degraded objects than misplaced? I asking this because I try simulate a disaster recovery scenario. Thanks and best regards, Fabio Abreu Reis http://fajlinux.com.br *Tel : *+55 21 98244-0161

Re: [ceph-users] Doubts about backfilling performance

Hi David , After studying a lot about this configuration I found this post. https://zeestrataca.com/posts/expanding-ceph-clusters-with-juju/ Thanks for your recommendation! Regards, Fabio Abreu On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 11:19 AM David Turner wrote: > Jewel is really limited on the setti

[ceph-users] Doubts about backfilling performance

my scenario. My environment is jewel 10.2.7 . Best Regards, Fabio Abreu -- Atenciosamente, Fabio Abreu Reis http://fajlinux.com.br *Tel : *+55 21 98244-0161 *Skype : *fabioabreureis ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http

Re: [ceph-users] Hardware difference in the same Rack

Hi Mohamad thanks for your email ! I try to separate my racks for each type of sata and create news pools in my environment. Thanks and Best Regards, Fabio Abreu On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 3:46 PM Mohamad Gebai wrote: > On 2/21/19 1:22 PM, Fabio Abreu wrote: > > Hi Everybody,

[ceph-users] Hardware difference in the same Rack

make sense to me because I will split nova process in the computes node if I have two pools . Regards, Fabio Abreu ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] Doubts about parameter "osd sleep recovery"

Hi Jean-Charles , I will validate this config in my laboratory and production, and share the results here. Thanks. Regards , Fabio Abreu On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 3:18 PM Jean-Charles Lopez wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > have a look here: > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/luminou

[ceph-users] Doubts about parameter "osd sleep recovery"

$ ceph tell osd.* injectargs '--osd-max-backfills 1' $ ceph tell osd.* injectargs '--osd-recovery-threads 1' $ ceph tell osd.* injectargs '--osd-recovery-op-priority 1' $ ceph tell osd.* injectargs '--osd-client-op-priority 63' $ ceph tell osd.* injectargs &#

Re: [ceph-users] moving a new hardware to cluster

ing 1 osd waiting the recovery and go to another one, because I have a history of move an entire storage and this change create slow requests and pg blocking. I asking this question early to try understand the experience of another ceph admins with this scenario. Thanks and best Regards, Fabio Abreu

[ceph-users] moving a new hardware to cluster

uster. Can someome recommend me what I should review before the new hardware move ? if I move osd to the cluster can I have more precaution in this scenario ? Regards, Fabio Abreu Reis http://fajlinux.com.br *Tel : *+55 21 98244-0161 *Skype : *fabioabre

[ceph-users] Ceph version upgrade with Juju

Hi Cephers, I have a little doubt about the migration of Jewel version in the MAAS / JUJU implementation scenario . Could someone has the same experience in production environment? I am asking this because we mapping all challenges of this scenario. Thanks and best Regards, Fabio Abreu