[ceph-users] Ceph - OpenStack space efficiency

Hello everyone, As we know the Openstack ceph integration uses ceph rbd snapshot feature to give more space efficiency. Mybquestion is if there some way to calculate this space saving/efficiency by using rbd snapshots/clones? ___ ceph-users mailing list

[ceph-users] Change protection/profile from a erasure coded pool

a previous created pool cannot be modified. I’d like to know if someone already done that and if someone has some recommendation for better way to make this done? Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph

[ceph-users] RGW + civetweb + SSL

Hello, I’d like to know if someone know how to setup a SSL implementation of RGW with civetweb? The only “documentation” that I found about that is a “bug” - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11239 - which I’d like to know if this kind of implementation really works? Regards. Italo Santos

[ceph-users] RadosGW - radosgw-agent start error

-07-28 17:02:03,120 3600 [radosgw_agent][ERROR ] RegionMapError: Could not retrieve region map from destination: make_request() got an unexpected keyword argument 'params' Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ ___ ceph-users mailing list

[ceph-users] RadosGW - Negative bucket stats

: {u'rgw.main': {u'num_objects': 8816, u'size_kb': 924889839, u'size_kb_actual': 924907368}, u'rgw.multimeta': {u'num_objects': 0, u'size_kb': 0, u'size_kb_actual': 0}, u'rgw.none': {u'num_objects': -1, u'size_kb': 0, u'size_kb_actual': 0}} Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW - Multiple instances on same host

/ceph.client.radosgw.instance-02.keyring rgw socket path = /var/run/ceph/ceph.radosgw.instance-02.fastcgi.sock log file = /var/log/radosgw/client.radosgw.log rgw dns name = instance-02.mydomain rgw enable apis = s3, admin rgw enable ops log = true At. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Wednesday, June 24

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW - Multiple instances on same host

do that with civetweb? Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 at 18:26, Somnath Roy wrote: Hi Italo, What we did was with civetweb and each RGW instances will be running with its own civetweb instances I guess. Now, it seems you are trying to run

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW - Multiple instances on same host

apis = s3, admin rgw enable ops log = true At. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 at 20:07, Somnath Roy wrote: Precisely… From: Italo Santos [mailto:okd...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 4:07 PM To: Robin H. Johnson Cc: Somnath Roy; ceph

[ceph-users] RadosGW - Restrict access to bucket

Hello guys, I have a object that I’ve set READ acl permission to all users, but I’d like to restrict the access to that object to a specific subnet, anyone knows if it’s possible? Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ ___ ceph-users

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW - Multiple instances on same host

Thanks guys! Doing this I’ll need have a load balancer in front of instances (like haproxy, nginx, etc…) to to redirect requests to each instance right? Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 at 20:01, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Override 'rgw

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW - Multiple instances on same host

:* LISTEN 25927/radosgw Thanks a lot for your help. Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 at 20:38, Somnath Roy wrote: I am not sure if you need to specify the ports like that (within quotes) rgw_frontends=civetweb port=7480

[ceph-users] RadosGW - Multiple instances on same host

Hello everyone, I’d like to know if someone knows if its possible run multiples radosgw instances on the same host? What I’m trying to do is have two diferente radosgw instances responding by different rgw dns... Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br

[ceph-users] RadosGW - Hardware recomendations

. Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW - Hardware recomendations

to give me high availability. Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Craig Lewis wrote: RadosGW is pretty light compared to the rest of Ceph, but it depends on your use case. RadosGW just needs network bandwidth and a bit of CPU

Re: [ceph-users] RGW + erasure coding

pool should be EC was the data pool (.rgw.buckets) Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 22:35, Somnath Roy wrote: Hi, I am planning to setup RGW on top of Erasure coded pool. RGW stores all of its data in the .rgw.buckets pool and I am planning

Re: [ceph-users] Shadow files

name: Translating a RadosGW object name into a filename on disk https://www.mail-archive.com/ceph-users@lists.ceph.com/msg12161.html http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg20426.html Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Yehuda Sadeh

Re: [ceph-users] Tr : RadosGW - Bucket link and ACLs

Yeah, I was thinking about that and will be the alternative for me too... Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 18:20, ghislain.cheval...@orange.com wrote: Message d'origine De : CHEVALIER Ghislain IMT/OLPS ghislain.cheval

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW - Create bucket via admin API

Hello Georgios, I thought which had some admin alternative to do that, but I realised don’t have once the bucket belongs to a specify user. So the alternative is, after create the user authenticate with created credentials to create the bucket. Thanks Regards. Italo Santos http

[ceph-users] RadosGW - Bucket link and ACLs

/AccessControlPolicy 2015-03-06 16:32:55.943977 7fd32bf57700 2 req 2:0.000809:s3:PUT /:put_acls:http status=403 2015-03-06 16:32:55.943986 7fd32bf57700 1 == req done req=0x3cf78a0 http_status=403 == At. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br

[ceph-users] RadosGW - Create bucket via admin API

Hello guys, On adminops documentation that saw how to remove a bucket, but I can’t find the URI to create one, I’d like to know if this is possible? Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users

Re: [ceph-users] Unexpected OSD down during deep-scrub

New issue created - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11027 Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: Hi Yann, That seems related to http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10536 which seems to be resolved. Could you create a new

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW do not populate log file

After change the ownership of the log file directory everything became fine. Thanks for your help Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 00:35, zhangdongmao wrote: I have met this before. Because I use apache with rgw, radosrgw is executed

[ceph-users] Unexpected OSD down during deep-scrub

*)+0x629) [0xcbade9] 10: (ThreadPool::WorkThread::entry()+0x10) [0xcbbfe0] 11: (()+0x6b50) [0x7f91bfe46b50] 12: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f91be8627bd] NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS executable` is needed to interpret this. At. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br

[ceph-users] RadosGW do not populate log file

Hello everyone, I have a radosgw configured with the bellow ceph.conf file, but this instanse aren't generate any log entry on log file path, the log is aways empty, but if I take a look to the apache access.log there are a lot of entries. Anyone knows why? Regards. Italo Santos http

Re: [ceph-users] librados - Atomic Write

Hello Noah, In may case the ordering is importante and I seen that librados have an lock implementation which I’ll use that on my implementation. Thanks for your help. Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 12:52, Noah Watkins wrote: I'll take

[ceph-users] librados - Atomic Write

Hello, The librados write ops are atomic? I mean what happens if two different clients try to write the same object with the same content? Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http

Re: [ceph-users] Total number PGs using multiple pools

Thanks for your answer. But what I’d like to understand is if this numbers are per pool bases or per cluster bases? If this number were per cluster bases I’ll plan on cluster deploy how much pools I’d like to have on that cluster and their replicas Regards. Italo Santos http

[ceph-users] RGW removed objects and rados pool

__shadow__ objects leaving on the pool: root@cephgw0001:~# rados -p .rgw.buckets.replicated ls default.1554751.1__shadow_.aoCI7rTnBbJKfb5jogxvLStSsbJnL27_1 Anyone know why? Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph

[ceph-users] Total number PGs using multiple pools

only ~111 PGs? Ex.: (100 * 10 OSDs) / 3 replicas = 333 PGs / 3 pools = 111 PGS per pool I don't know if reasoning is right… I’ll glad for any help. Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] Erasure coded PGs incomplete

, with one host less I still able to read and write data on cluster? - To solve the issue I’ll need add another host on cluster? Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 20:19, Loic Dachary wrote: On 17/12/2014 19:46, Italo Santos wrote

[ceph-users] Erasure code pool overhead

Hello, I’d like to know how can I calculate the overhead of a erasure pool? Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] Erasure code pool overhead

Thanks Nick. At. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 at 18:44, Nick Fisk wrote: Hi Italo, =k/(k+m) Where k is data chunks and m is coding chunks. For example k=8 m=2 would give you =8/(8+2) .8 or 80% usable storage and 20% used

Re: [ceph-users] Erasure coded PGs incomplete

Hello Loic, Thanks for you help, I’ve take a look to my crush map and I replace step chooseleaf indep 0 type osd” by step choose indep 0 type osd” and all PGs was created successfully. At. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Loic Dachary

Re: [ceph-users] Erasure coded PGs incomplete

, I’ll need the sufficient number of hosts to support create total PGs? Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: Hi, Thanks for the update : good news are much appreciated :-) Would you have time to review

Re: [ceph-users] Erasure coded PGs incomplete

Loic, So, if want have a failure domain by host, I’ll need set up a erasure profile which k+m = total number of hosts I have, right? Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: On 17/12/2014 18:18, Italo Santos

Re: [ceph-users] Erasure coded PGs incomplete

an OSD or a host? Regards. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: On 17/12/2014 19:22, Italo Santos wrote: Loic, So, if want have a failure domain by host, I’ll need set up a erasure profile which k+m = total

[ceph-users] Erasure coded PGs incomplete

') At. Italo Santos http://italosantos.com.br/ ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com