On 22/03/19 16:16 +0100, Paul Emmerich wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 4:05 PM Dan van der Ster wrote:
Perfect, thanks for that input.
So, in your experience the async snaptrim mechanism doesn't make it as
transparent as scrubbing etc.?
On the rbd side, the impact of snaptrim seems invisible
On 21/03/19 16:15 +0100, Dan van der Ster wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 1:50 PM Tom Barron wrote:
On 20/03/19 16:33 +0100, Dan van der Ster wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>We're currently upgrading our cephfs (managed by OpenStack Manila)
>clusters to Mimic, and want to start enabli
cephfs-snap directly rather than using Manila
-- and of course that's fine -- but if you'd share them it will help
us Manila developers consider whether there are use cases that we are
not currently addressing that we should consider.
Thanks,
-- Tom Barron
On 07/08/2016 11:59 AM, Manuel Lausch wrote:
> hi,
>
> In the last days I do play around with ceph jewel on debian Jessie and
> CentOS 7. Now I have a question about systemd on this Systems.
>
> I installed ceph jewel (ceph version 10.2.2
> (45107e21c568dd033c2f0a3107dec8f0b0e58374)) on debian
