Great, thanks for the update.
Jason
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:06 PM, Alex Gorbachev
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Alex Gorbachev
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
>>> If you run "partprobe" after you resize in your second example, is the
>>> chan
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Alex Gorbachev
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
>> If you run "partprobe" after you resize in your second example, is the
>> change visible in "parted"?
>
> No, partprobe does not help:
>
> root@lumd1:~# parted /dev/nbd2 p
> Model:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> If you run "partprobe" after you resize in your second example, is the
> change visible in "parted"?
No, partprobe does not help:
root@lumd1:~# parted /dev/nbd2 p
Model: Unknown (unknown)
Disk /dev/nbd2: 2147MB
Sector size (logical/physica
If you run "partprobe" after you resize in your second example, is the
change visible in "parted"?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Alex Gorbachev
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
>> I've tested the patch on both 4.14.0 and 4.16.0 and it appears to
>> function co
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> I've tested the patch on both 4.14.0 and 4.16.0 and it appears to
> function correctly for me. parted can see the newly added free-space
> after resizing the RBD image and our stress tests once again pass
> successfully. Do you have any addi
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> I've tested the patch on both 4.14.0 and 4.16.0 and it appears to
> function correctly for me. parted can see the newly added free-space
> after resizing the RBD image and our stress tests once again pass
> successfully. Do you have any addi
I've tested the patch on both 4.14.0 and 4.16.0 and it appears to
function correctly for me. parted can see the newly added free-space
after resizing the RBD image and our stress tests once again pass
successfully. Do you have any additional details on the issues you are
seeing?
On Wed, Apr 11, 20
I'll give it a try locally and see if I can figure it out. Note that
this commit [1] also dropped the call to "bd_set_size" within
"nbd_size_update", which seems suspicious to me at initial glance.
[1]
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/29eaadc0364943b6352e8994158febcb699c9f9b#diff-bc9273bc
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Alex Gorbachev
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:43 AM, Mykola Golub
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:14:58PM -0400, Alex Gorbachev wrote:
>>>
So Josef fixed the one issue that enables e.g. lsblk and sysfs size to
reflect the correct siz
Do you have a preliminary patch that we can test against?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Alex Gorbachev
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:43 AM, Mykola Golub wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:14:58PM -0400, Alex Gorbachev wrote:
>>
>>> So Josef fixed the one issue that enables e.g. lsblk
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:43 AM, Mykola Golub wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:14:58PM -0400, Alex Gorbachev wrote:
>
>> So Josef fixed the one issue that enables e.g. lsblk and sysfs size to
>> reflect the correct siz on change. However, partptobe and parted
>> still do not detect the change,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:14:58PM -0400, Alex Gorbachev wrote:
> So Josef fixed the one issue that enables e.g. lsblk and sysfs size to
> reflect the correct siz on change. However, partptobe and parted
> still do not detect the change, complete unmap and remap of rbd-nbd
> device and remount of
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Alex Gorbachev
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Mykola Golub wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 08:25:15PM -0500, Alex Gorbachev wrote:
>>> I am running into the problem described in
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/19/565 and
>>> https://tracker.ceph.com
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Mykola Golub wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 08:25:15PM -0500, Alex Gorbachev wrote:
>> I am running into the problem described in
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/19/565 and
>> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/23137
>>
>> I went ahead and built a custom kernel reve
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 08:25:15PM -0500, Alex Gorbachev wrote:
> I am running into the problem described in
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/19/565 and
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/23137
>
> I went ahead and built a custom kernel reverting the change
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/
15 matches
Mail list logo
