Re: [ceph-users] Advice on migrating from legacy tunables to Jewel tunables.

ar...@redhat.com> > To: "Goncalo Borges" <goncalo.bor...@sydney.edu.au> > Cc: "ceph-users" <ceph-us...@ceph.com> > Sent: Tuesday, 9 August, 2016 02:34:11 > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Advice on migrating from legacy tunables to Jewel > tunables

Re: [ceph-users] Advice on migrating from legacy tunables to Jewel tunables.

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Goncalo Borges wrote: > Thanks for replying Greg. > > I am trying to figure oout what parameters should I tune to mitigate the > impact of the data movement. For now, I've set > >osd max backfills = 1 > > Are there others you think

Re: [ceph-users] Advice on migrating from legacy tunables to Jewel tunables.

Thanks for replying Greg. I am trying to figure oout what parameters should I tune to mitigate the impact of the data movement. For now, I've set osd max backfills = 1 Are there others you think we should set? What do you reckon? Cheers Goncalo On 08/09/2016 09:26 AM, Gregory Farnum

Re: [ceph-users] Advice on migrating from legacy tunables to Jewel tunables.

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Goncalo Borges wrote: > Dear cephers... > > I am looking for some advice on migrating from legacy tunables to Jewel > tunables. > > What would be the best strategy? > > 1) A step by step approach? > - starting with the transition

[ceph-users] Advice on migrating from legacy tunables to Jewel tunables.

Dear cephers... I am looking for some advice on migrating from legacy tunables to Jewel tunables. What would be the best strategy? 1) A step by step approach? - starting with the transition from bobtail to firefly (and, in this particular step, by starting to set setting