I don't think it's the symlink that's the problem, but the path
permissions being something other than open. That may be why you didn't
see this. I am hoping symlinks still work, as I know we will need them
for our application.
Jason
On 6/17/16, 1:50 AM, "ceph-users on behalf of Oliver
Thank you very much - we will be testing this soon.
Jason
On 6/16/16, 11:11 PM, "Yan, Zheng" wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Jason Gress wrote:
>> This is the latest default kernel with CentOS7. We also tried a newer
>> kernel (from elrepo),
Hi,
just to verify this:
no symlink usage == no problem/bug
right ?
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards
Oliver Dzombic
IP-Interactive
mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de
Anschrift:
IP Interactive UG ( haftungsbeschraenkt )
Zum Sonnenberg 1-3
63571 Gelnhausen
HRB 93402 beim Amtsgericht
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Jason Gress wrote:
> This is the latest default kernel with CentOS7. We also tried a newer
> kernel (from elrepo), a 4.4 that has the same problem, so I don't think
> that is it. Thank you for the suggestion though.
>
> We upgraded our
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Adam Tygart wrote:
> This sounds an awful lot like a a bug I've run into a few times (not
> often enough to get a good backtrace out of the kernel or mds)
> involving vim on a symlink to a file in another directory. It will
> occasionally corrupt
This sounds an awful lot like a a bug I've run into a few times (not
often enough to get a good backtrace out of the kernel or mds)
involving vim on a symlink to a file in another directory. It will
occasionally corrupt the symlink in such a way that the symlink is
unreadable. Filling dmesg with:
This is the latest default kernel with CentOS7. We also tried a newer
kernel (from elrepo), a 4.4 that has the same problem, so I don't think
that is it. Thank you for the suggestion though.
We upgraded our cluster to the 10.2.2 release today, and it didn't resolve
all of the issues. It's
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Jason Gress wrote:
> While trying to use CephFS as a clustered filesystem, we stumbled upon a
> reproducible bug that is unfortunately pretty serious, as it leads to data
> loss. Here is the situation:
>
> We have two systems, named ftp01
Hi,
i have identical setup, except that i run 10.2.2 now.
I can not reproduce that.
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards
Oliver Dzombic
IP-Interactive
mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de
Anschrift:
IP Interactive UG ( haftungsbeschraenkt )
Zum Sonnenberg 1-3
63571 Gelnhausen
HRB 93402
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Jason Gress wrote:
> While trying to use CephFS as a clustered filesystem, we stumbled upon a
> reproducible bug that is unfortunately pretty serious, as it leads to data
> loss. Here is the situation:
>
> We have two systems, named ftp01
While trying to use CephFS as a clustered filesystem, we stumbled upon a
reproducible bug that is unfortunately pretty serious, as it leads to data
loss. Here is the situation:
We have two systems, named ftp01 and ftp02. They are both running CentOS 7.2,
with this kernel release and ceph
11 matches
Mail list logo