> Muwhahahahaha, that was a much needed laugh after the adrenaline rush of
> phasing in a cache tier in the wee hours of last night. ^o^
${subject} is my bad -;
A pretty much lol. Sorry for my typo!
> 1. It quite amuses me that a Redhat employee (or so one deduces from your
> mail address) goes
Hello,
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 11:08:05 +1000 Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
> On 28/02/2016 10:23 AM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote:
> > Does the Ceph have ${subject}?
>
> Well ceph 0.67 was codename "Dumpling", and we are well past that, so
> yes I guess ceph has mostly been dedumplified. Which is a shame
On 28/02/2016 10:23 AM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote:
Does the Ceph have ${subject}?
Well ceph 0.67 was codename "Dumpling", and we are well past that, so
yes I guess ceph has mostly been dedumplified. Which is a shame because
I love dumplings! Yum!
--
Lindsay Mathieson
Hello,
Does the Ceph have ${subject}?
Cheers,
Shinobu
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
