I'm not sure why crushtool --test --simulate doesn't match what the
cluster actually does, but the cluster seems to be executing the rules
even though crushtool doesn't. Just kind of stinks that you have to
test the rules on actual data.
Should I create a ticket for this?
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11224
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@gregs42.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Robert LeBlanc rob...@leblancnet.us wrote:
I'm not sure why crushtool --test --simulate doesn't match what the
cluster actually does, but the cluster
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Robert LeBlanc rob...@leblancnet.us wrote:
I'm not sure why crushtool --test --simulate doesn't match what the
cluster actually does, but the cluster seems to be executing the rules
even though crushtool doesn't. Just kind of stinks that you have to
test the
I'm trying to create a CRUSH ruleset and I'm using crushtool to test
the rules, but it doesn't seem to mapping things correctly. I have two
roots, on for spindles and another for SSD. I have two rules, one for
each root. The output of crushtool on rule 0 shows objects being
mapped to SSD OSDs when
