Hi,
On 03/18/2015 03:01 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
I think it tended to crash rather than
hang like this so I'm a bit surprised, but if this op is touching a
broken file or something that could explain it.
FWIW, the last time I had the issue (on a 3.10.9 kernel), btrfs was
freezing, waiting
% osds down, CPUs still busy; will the
cluster recover without help?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Chris Murray chrismurra...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, I was wondering myself if compression could be causing an issue, but I'm
reconsidering now. My latest experiment should hopefully help troubleshoot
is fixed in something later than 0.80.9?
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Farnum [mailto:g...@gregs42.com]
Sent: 18 March 2015 14:01
To: Chris Murray
Cc: ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] More than 50% osds down, CPUs still busy; will the
cluster recover without help?
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Chris Murray chrismurra...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, I was wondering myself if compression could be causing an issue, but I'm
reconsidering now. My latest experiment should hopefully help troubleshoot.
So, I remembered that ZLIB is slower, but is more 'safe for old
. In case I should be troubleshooting this side, is/isn't this happening
to others?
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Farnum [mailto:g...@gregs42.com]
Sent: 16 March 2015 20:40
To: Chris Murray
Cc: ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] More than 50% osds down, CPUs still busy; will the
cluster
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Chris Murray chrismurra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again Greg :-)
No, it doesn't seem to progress past that point. I started the OSD again a
couple of nights ago:
2015-03-16 21:34:46.221307 7fe4a8aa7780 10 journal op_apply_finish 13288339
open_ops 1 - 0,
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Farnum [mailto:g...@gregs42.com]
Sent: 02 March 2015 18:05
To: Chris Murray
Cc: ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] More than 50% osds down, CPUs still busy; will the
cluster recover without help?
You can turn the filestore up to 20 instead of 1. ;) You might
Farnum [mailto:g...@gregs42.com]
Sent: 02 March 2015 18:05
To: Chris Murray
Cc: ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] More than 50% osds down, CPUs still busy; will the
cluster recover without help?
You can turn the filestore up to 20 instead of 1. ;) You might also explore
what information you can
To: Gregory Farnum
Cc: ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] More than 50% osds down, CPUs still busy;will
the cluster recover without help?
A little further logging:
2015-02-27 10:27:15.745585 7fe8e3f2f700 20 osd.11 62839 update_osd_stat
osd_stat(1305 GB used, 1431 GB avail, 2789 GB total, peers
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] More than 50% osds down, CPUs still busy;will
the cluster recover without help?
That's interesting, it seems to be alternating between two lines, but
only one thread this time? I'm guessing the 62738 is the osdmap, which
is much behind where it should be? Osd.0 and osd.3
down, CPUs still busy; will the
cluster recover without help?
If you turn up debug osd = 20 or something it'll apply a good bit more disk
load but give you more debugging logs about what's going on.
It could be that you're in enough of a mess now that it's stuck trying to
calculate past
-users] More than 50% osds down, CPUs still busy; will
the cluster recover without help?
If you turn up debug osd = 20 or something it'll apply a good bit more
disk load but give you more debugging logs about what's going on.
It could be that you're in enough of a mess now that it's stuck trying
February 2015 12:58
To: Gregory Farnum
Cc: ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] More than 50% osds down, CPUs still busy;will
the cluster recover without help?
Thanks Greg
After seeing some recommendations I found in another thread, my
impatience got the better of me, and I've start the process again
[mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
Chris Murray
Sent: 25 February 2015 12:58
To: Gregory Farnum
Cc: ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] More than 50% osds down, CPUs still busy;will
the cluster recover without help?
Thanks Greg
After seeing some recommendations I found
Thanks Greg
After seeing some recommendations I found in another thread, my impatience got
the better of me, and I've start the process again, but there is some logic, I
promise :-)
I've copied the process from Michael Kidd, I believe, and it goes along the
lines of:
setting noup, noin,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Chris Murray chrismurra...@gmail.com wrote:
... Trying to send again after reporting bounce backs to dreamhost ...
... Trying to send one more time after seeing mails come through the
list today ...
Hi all,
First off, I should point out that this is a 'small
... Trying to send again after reporting bounce backs to dreamhost ...
... Trying to send one more time after seeing mails come through the
list today ...
Hi all,
First off, I should point out that this is a 'small cluster' issue and
may well be due to the stretched resources. If I'm doomed to
17 matches
Mail list logo
