Re: [ceph-users] Priority for backfilling misplaced and degraded objects

2018-11-01 Thread Jonas Jelten
Hm I'm not so sure, because we did have a disk outage indeed. When we added many new disks, 50% of objects were misplaced. Then the disk failed and ~2% of objects were degraded. The recovery went on fine, but I would expect that fixing the degraded objects should have a priority over data migrati

Re: [ceph-users] Priority for backfilling misplaced and degraded objects

2018-11-01 Thread Janne Johansson
I think that all the misplaced PGs that are in the queue that get writes _while_ waiting for backfill will get the "degraded" status, meaning that before they were just on the wrong place, now they are on the wrong place, AND the newly made PG they should backfill into will get an old dump made fir

[ceph-users] Priority for backfilling misplaced and degraded objects

2018-10-31 Thread Jonas Jelten
Hello! My cluster currently has this health state: 2018-10-31 21:20:13.694633 mon.lol [WRN] Health check update: 39010709/192173470 objects misplaced (20.300%) (OBJECT_MISPLACED) 2018-10-31 21:20:13.694684 mon.lol [WRN] Health check update: Degraded data redundancy: 1624786/192173470 objects de