Hello,
separate public/private networks make sense for clusters that:
a) have vastly more storage bandwidth than a single link can handle or
b) are extremely read heavy on the client side, so replication reads can
be separated from the client ones.
I posit that neither is the case in your
To be clear for future responders, separate mds and mon servers are in the
design. Everything is the same as the osd hardware except the chassis and
there aren't 24 hdds in there.
On May 23, 2016 4:27 PM, "Oliver Dzombic" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> keep it simple, would be in my
Hi,
keep it simple, would be in my opinion devide different tasks to
different servers and networks.
The more stuff is running on one device, the higher is the chance that
they will influence each other and this way make debugging harder.
Our first setup's had all ( mon, osd, mds ) on one
> Op 23 mei 2016 om 21:53 schreef Brady Deetz :
>
>
> TLDR;
> Has anybody deployed a Ceph cluster using a single 40 gig nic? This is
> discouraged in
> http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/configuration/network-config-ref/
>
> "One NIC OSD in a Two Network Cluster:
>
combination it can go up to 56Gb/s..
Thanks & Regards
Somnath
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of Brady
Deetz
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 12:53 PM
To: ceph-users
Subject: [ceph-users] Public and Private network over 1 interface
TLDR;
Has anybody deployed a
TLDR;
Has anybody deployed a Ceph cluster using a single 40 gig nic? This is
discouraged in
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/configuration/network-config-ref/
"One NIC OSD in a Two Network Cluster:
Generally, we do not recommend deploying an OSD host with a single NIC in a
cluster with two