Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW ops log lag?

2019-04-17 Thread Matt Benjamin
It should not be best effort. As written, exactly rgw_usage_log_flush_threshold outstanding log entries will be buffered. The default value for this parameter is 1024, which is probably not high for a sustained workload, but you could experiment with reducing it. Matt On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW ops log lag?

2019-04-12 Thread Aaron Bassett
Ok thanks. Is the expectation that events will be available on that socket as soon as the occur or is it more of a best effort situation? I'm just trying to nail down which side of the socket might be lagging. It's pretty difficult to recreate this as I have to hit the cluster very hard to get

Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW ops log lag?

2019-04-12 Thread Matt Benjamin
Hi Aaron, I don't think that exists currently. Matt On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:12 AM Aaron Bassett wrote: > > I have an radogw log centralizer that we use to for an audit trail for data > access in our ceph clusters. We've enabled the ops log socket and added > logging of the

[ceph-users] RadosGW ops log lag?

2019-04-12 Thread Aaron Bassett
I have an radogw log centralizer that we use to for an audit trail for data access in our ceph clusters. We've enabled the ops log socket and added logging of the http_authorization header to it: rgw log http headers = "http_authorization" rgw ops log socket path = /var/run/ceph/rgw-ops.sock