From: bhi...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 18:13:25 -0800
To: erdem.agao...@gmail.com
CC: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Some long running ops may lock osd
We're seeing a lot of this as well. (as i mentioned to sage at
SCALE
CC: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Some long running ops may lock osd
We're seeing a lot of this as well. (as i mentioned to sage at
SCALE..) Is there a rule of thumb at all for how big is safe to let a
RGW bucket get?
Also, is this theoretically resolved by the new
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Some long running ops may lock osd
We're seeing a lot of this as well. (as i mentioned to sage at
SCALE..) Is there a rule of thumb at all for how big is safe to let a
RGW bucket get?
Also, is this theoretically resolved by the new bucket-sharding
feature
We're seeing a lot of this as well. (as i mentioned to sage at
SCALE..) Is there a rule of thumb at all for how big is safe to let a
RGW bucket get?
Also, is this theoretically resolved by the new bucket-sharding
feature in the latest dev release?
-Ben
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Erdem
...
Thanks,
Guang
From: bhi...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 18:13:25 -0800
To: erdem.agao...@gmail.com
CC: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Some long running ops may lock osd
We're seeing a lot of this as well
Hi all, especially devs,
We have recently pinpointed one of the causes of slow requests in our
cluster. It seems deep-scrubs on pg's that contain the index file for a
large radosgw bucket lock the osds. Incresing op threads and/or disk
threads helps a little bit, but we need to increase them
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Erdem Agaoglu erdem.agao...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all, especially devs,
We have recently pinpointed one of the causes of slow requests in our
cluster. It seems deep-scrubs on pg's that contain the index file for a
large radosgw bucket lock the osds. Incresing op
Hi Gregory,
We are not using listomapkeys that way or in any way to be precise. I used
it here just to reproduce the behavior/issue.
What i am really interested in is if scrubbing-deep actually mitigates the
problem and/or is there something that can be further improved.
Or i guess we should go
