Hi Matt,
On 4/17/19 1:08 AM, Matt Benjamin wrote:
Why is using an explicit unix socket problematic for you? For what it
does, that decision has always seemed sensible.
In fact, I don't understand why the "ops" logs have a different
way from the logs of the process radosgw itself.
Hi Francois,
Why is using an explicit unix socket problematic for you? For what it
does, that decision has always seemed sensible.
Matt
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:04 PM Francois Lafont
wrote:
>
> Hi @all,
>
> On 4/9/19 12:43 PM, Francois Lafont wrote:
>
> > I have tried this config:
> >
> >
Hi @all,
On 4/9/19 12:43 PM, Francois Lafont wrote:
I have tried this config:
-
rgw enable ops log = true
rgw ops log socket path = /tmp/opslog
rgw log http headers = http_x_forwarded_for
-
and I have logs in the socket /tmp/opslog like this:
-
On 4/9/19 12:43 PM, Francois Lafont wrote:
2. In my Docker container context, is it possible to put the logs above in the file
"/var/log/syslog" of my host, in other words is it possible to make sure to log this in
stdout of the daemon "radosgw"?
In brief, is it possible log "operations" in
Hi,
On 4/9/19 5:02 AM, Pavan Rallabhandi wrote:
Refer "rgw log http headers" under
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/nautilus/radosgw/config-ref/
Or even better in the code https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/7639
Ok, thx for your help Pavan. I have progressed but I have already some
problems.
Refer "rgw log http headers" under
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/nautilus/radosgw/config-ref/
Or even better in the code https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/7639
Thanks,
-Pavan.
On 4/8/19, 8:32 PM, "ceph-users on behalf of Francois Lafont"
wrote:
Hi @all,
I'm using Ceph rados
Hi @all,
I'm using Ceph rados gateway installed via ceph-ansible with the Nautilus
version. The radosgw are behind a haproxy which add these headers (checked
via tcpdump):
X-Forwarded-Proto: http
X-Forwarded-For: 10.111.222.55
where 10.111.222.55 is the IP address of the client. The
