On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Bill Sharer wrote:
> After your comment about the dual mds servers I decided to just give up
> trying to get the second restarted. After eyeballing what I had on one
> of the new Ryzen boxes for drive space, I decided to just dump the
>
After your comment about the dual mds servers I decided to just give up
trying to get the second restarted. After eyeballing what I had on one
of the new Ryzen boxes for drive space, I decided to just dump the
filesystem. That will also make things go faster if and when I flip
everything over to
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Bill Sharer wrote:
> I was wondering if I can't get the second mds back up That offline
> backward scrub check sounds like it should be able to also salvage what
> it can of the two pools to a normal filesystem. Is there an option for
I was wondering if I can't get the second mds back up That offline
backward scrub check sounds like it should be able to also salvage what
it can of the two pools to a normal filesystem. Is there an option for
that or has someone written some form of salvage tool?
On 10/11/2017 07:07 AM,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Bill Sharer wrote:
> I've been in the process of updating my gentoo based cluster both with
> new hardware and a somewhat postponed update. This includes some major
> stuff including the switch from gcc 4.x to 5.4.0 on existing hardware
>
I've been in the process of updating my gentoo based cluster both with
new hardware and a somewhat postponed update. This includes some major
stuff including the switch from gcc 4.x to 5.4.0 on existing hardware
and using gcc 6.4.0 to make better use of AMD Ryzen on the new
hardware. The