Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy: recommended?

[Anthony D'Atri]

> ?I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended
> for production clusters.? 

InkTank had sort of discouraged the use of ceph-deploy; in 2014 we used it only 
to deploy OSDs.

Some time later the message changed.


___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy: recommended?

[David Turner]

I looked through the backlog for ceph-deploy.  It has some pretty intense
stuff including bugs for random environments that aren't ubuntu or
redhat/centos.  Not really something I could manage in my off time.

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:15 PM <ceph.nov...@habmalnefrage.de> wrote:

> ... we use (only!) ceph-deploy in all our environments, tools and scripts.
>
> If I look in the efforts went into ceph-volume and all the related issues,
> "manual LVM" overhead and/or still missing features, PLUS the in the same
> discussions mentioned recommendations to use something like ceph-ansible in
> parallel for the missing stuff, I can only hope we will find a (full
> time?!) maintainer for ceph-deploy and keep it alive. PLEASE ;)
>
>
>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 05. April 2018 um 08:53 Uhr
> Von: "Wido den Hollander" <w...@42on.com>
> An: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Betreff: Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy: recommended?
>
> On 04/04/2018 08:58 PM, Robert Stanford wrote:
> >
> >  I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended
> > for production clusters.  Why was that?  Is this still the case?  We
> > have a lot of problems automating deployment without ceph-deploy.
> >
> >
>
> In the end it is just a Python tool which deploys the daemons. It is not
> active in any way. Stability of the cluster is not determined by the use
> of ceph-deploy, but by the runnings daemons.
>
> I use ceph-deploy sometimes in very large deployments to make my life a
> bit easier.
>
> Wido
>
> > ___
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com[http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com]
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy: recommended?

[ceph . novice]

... we use (only!) ceph-deploy in all our environments, tools and scripts.

If I look in the efforts went into ceph-volume and all the related issues, 
"manual LVM" overhead and/or still missing features, PLUS the in the same 
discussions mentioned recommendations to use something like ceph-ansible in 
parallel for the missing stuff, I can only hope we will find a (full time?!) 
maintainer for ceph-deploy and keep it alive. PLEASE ;)
 
 

Gesendet: Donnerstag, 05. April 2018 um 08:53 Uhr
Von: "Wido den Hollander" <w...@42on.com>
An: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Betreff: Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy: recommended?

On 04/04/2018 08:58 PM, Robert Stanford wrote:
>
>  I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended
> for production clusters.  Why was that?  Is this still the case?  We
> have a lot of problems automating deployment without ceph-deploy.
>
>

In the end it is just a Python tool which deploys the daemons. It is not
active in any way. Stability of the cluster is not determined by the use
of ceph-deploy, but by the runnings daemons.

I use ceph-deploy sometimes in very large deployments to make my life a
bit easier.

Wido

> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com[http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com]
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy: recommended?

[Wido den Hollander]

On 04/04/2018 08:58 PM, Robert Stanford wrote:
> 
>  I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended
> for production clusters.  Why was that?  Is this still the case?  We
> have a lot of problems automating deployment without ceph-deploy.
> 
> 

In the end it is just a Python tool which deploys the daemons. It is not
active in any way. Stability of the cluster is not determined by the use
of ceph-deploy, but by the runnings daemons.

I use ceph-deploy sometimes in very large deployments to make my life a
bit easier.

Wido

> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> 
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy: recommended?

[Dietmar Rieder]

On 04/04/2018 08:58 PM, Robert Stanford wrote:
> 
>  I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended
> for production clusters.  Why was that?  Is this still the case?  We
> have a lot of problems automating deployment without ceph-deploy.
> 

We are using it in production on our luminous cluster for deploying and
updating. No problems so far.  It is very helpful.

Dietmar

-- 
_
D i e t m a r  R i e d e r, Mag.Dr.
Innsbruck Medical University
Biocenter - Division for Bioinformatics
Innrain 80, 6020 Innsbruck
Email: dietmar.rie...@i-med.ac.at
Web:   http://www.icbi.at

___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy: recommended?

[Brady Deetz]

We use ceph-deploy in production. That said, our crush map is getting more
complex and we are starting to make use of other tooling as that occurs.
But we still use ceph-deploy to install ceph and bootstrap OSDs.

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 1:58 PM Robert Stanford 
wrote:

>
>  I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended for
> production clusters.  Why was that?  Is this still the case?  We have a lot
> of problems automating deployment without ceph-deploy.
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy: recommended?

[ceph]

Am 4. April 2018 20:58:19 MESZ schrieb Robert Stanford 
:
>I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended
>for
>production clusters.  Why was that?  Is this still the case?  We have a
I cannot Imagine that. Did use it Now a few versions before 2.0 and it works 
Great. We use it in production. 

- Mehmet 
>lot
>of problems automating deployment without ceph-deploy.
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[ceph-users] ceph-deploy: recommended?

[Robert Stanford]

 I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended for
production clusters.  Why was that?  Is this still the case?  We have a lot
of problems automating deployment without ceph-deploy.
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com