I am looking one problematic pg on my disaster scenario and look at
bellow :
root@monitor~# ceph pg ls-by-pool cinder_sata | grep 5.5b7
5.5b7 26911 29 53851 107644 29 11224818892853258
53258 active+recovering+undersized+degraded+remapped 2019-03-11
14:05:29.857657 95096'33589806 95169:37258027 [96,47,38]
96 [154] 15465986'27640790 2019-01-21 19:36:06.645070
65986'27640790 2019-01-21 19:36:06.645070
My problematic pg has 3 osds acting and one another osd acting primary :
up up_primary acting acting_primary
9 [96,47,38] 96 [154]154
If I compare with a good one we look this :
up_primary acting acting_primary
85 [85,102,143]85
The problematic pg scenario is a normal thing ?
Regards,
Fabio Abreu
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:01 AM David Turner wrote:
> Ceph has been getting better and better about prioritizing this sorry of
> recovery, but free of those optimizations are in Jewel, which had been out
> of the support cycle for about a year. You should look into upgrading to
> mimic where you should see a pretty good improvement on this sorry of
> prioritization.
>
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2019, 3:10 PM Fabio Abreu wrote:
>
>> HI Everybody,
>>
>> I have a doubt about degraded objects in the Jewel 10.2.7 version, can I
>> priorize the degraded objects than misplaced?
>>
>> I asking this because I try simulate a disaster recovery scenario.
>>
>>
>> Thanks and best regards,
>> Fabio Abreu Reis
>> http://fajlinux.com.br
>> *Tel : *+55 21 98244-0161
>> *Skype : *fabioabreureis
>> ___
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>
--
Atenciosamente,
Fabio Abreu Reis
http://fajlinux.com.br
*Tel : *+55 21 98244-0161
*Skype : *fabioabreureis
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
