Hi,
On 06/20/2018 07:20 PM, David Turner wrote:
We originally used pacemaker to move a VIP between our RGWs, but ultimately
decided to go with an LB in front of them. With an LB you can utilize both
RGWs while they're up, but the LB will shy away from either if they're down
until the check sta
Has any one, done or working a way to do S3(radosgw) failover.
I am trying to work out away to have 2 radosgw servers, with an VIP
when one server goes down it will go over to the other.
May be better failover + load balancing?
For example - nginx do this + TLS.
k
___
We originally used pacemaker to move a VIP between our RGWs, but ultimately
decided to go with an LB in front of them. With an LB you can utilize both
RGWs while they're up, but the LB will shy away from either if they're down
until the check starts succeeding for that host again. We do have 2 LB
Hi,
Perhaps not optimal nor exactly what you want but round robin DNS works
with two (or more) vanilla radosgw servers ok for me as a very
rudimentary form of failover and load balancing.
If you wanted active/standby you could use something like pacemaker to
start services and move the vIP a
Hay All
Has any one, done or working a way to do S3(radosgw) failover.
I am trying to work out away to have 2 radosgw servers, with an VIP
when one server goes down it will go over to the other.
I am trying this with CTDB, but while testing the upload can fail and then
carry on or just hand and
