ditional replica, and that would improve the
> recovery and read performance.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Maxime
>
>
>
> *From: *ceph-users <ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com> on behalf of
> Henrik Korkuc <li...@kirneh.eu>
> *Date: *Friday 3 March 2017 11:35
&
improve the recovery and read
performance.
Cheers,
Maxime
From: ceph-users <ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com> on behalf of Henrik Korkuc
<li...@kirneh.eu>
Date: Friday 3 March 2017 11:35
To: "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
Subject: Re: [c
On 17-03-03 12:30, Matteo Dacrema wrote:
Hi All,
I’ve a production cluster made of 8 nodes, 166 OSDs and 4 Journal SSD
every 5 OSDs with replica 2 for a total RAW space of 150 TB.
I’ve few question about it:
* It’s critical to have replica 2? Why?
Replica size 3 is highly recommended. I
Hi All,
I’ve a production cluster made of 8 nodes, 166 OSDs and 4 Journal SSD every 5
OSDs with replica 2 for a total RAW space of 150 TB.
I’ve few question about it:
It’s critical to have replica 2? Why?
Does replica 3 makes recovery faster?
Does replica 3 makes rebalancing and recovery less
