[ceph-users] Re: Bucket rename with
Den fre 14 feb. 2020 kl 23:02 skrev EDH - Manuel Rios < mrios...@easydatahost.com>: > Honestly, not having a function to rename bucket from admin rgw-admin is > like not having a function to copy or move. It is something basic, since if > not the workarround, it is to create a new bucket and move all the files > with the consequent loss of time and cost of computation. In addition to > the interruption. > Im sure that im not the only one administrator of rgw that need rename > some buckets, because by default system let Users for example use CAPITIAL > letter and that's not compliance. > I wonder if the "bucketnames might also become hostnames" weighed into the reluctance for renames, but I have also wanted to have renames, in the reverse situation where I did copy contents to another bucket (placed on a better place) and wanted to "copy OLD to NEW, rename OLD to OLD2, rename NEW to OLD, slowly delete OLD2" to have the shortest possible downtime while still doing a full object copy. -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive. ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
[ceph-users] Re: Bucket rename with
The world lived for a long time without it, but it's certainly useful. If Abhishek and/or the backport team would like this for Nautilus, I will help retarget our downstream backport (it's bigger than 22 commits with the dependencies, I believe, n.b.). Matt On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 5:02 PM EDH - Manuel Rios wrote: > > Honestly, not having a function to rename bucket from admin rgw-admin is like > not having a function to copy or move. It is something basic, since if not > the workarround, it is to create a new bucket and move all the files with the > consequent loss of time and cost of computation. In addition to the > interruption. > > Im sure that im not the only one administrator of rgw that need rename some > buckets, because by default system let Users for example use CAPITIAL letter > and that's not compliance. > > KR, > Manuel > > -Mensaje original- > De: J. Eric Ivancich > Enviado el: viernes, 14 de febrero de 2020 20:47 > Para: EDH - Manuel Rios > CC: ceph-users@ceph.io > Asunto: Re: [ceph-users] Bucket rename with > > On 2/4/20 12:29 PM, EDH - Manuel Rios wrote: > > Hi > > > > Some Customer asked us for a normal easy problem, they want rename a bucket. > > > > Checking the Nautilus documentation looks by now its not possible, but I > > checked master documentation and a CLI should be accomplish this apparently. > > > > $ radosgw-admin bucket link --bucket=foo --bucket-new-name=bar --uid=johnny > > > > Will be backported to Nautilus? Or its still just for developer/master > > users? > > > > https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/man/8/radosgw-admin/ > Given both that it's a feature and the sheer size of the PR -- 22 commits and > 32 files altered -- my guess is that it will not be backported to Nautilus. > However I'll invite the principals to weigh in. > > Best, > > Eric > > -- > J. Eric Ivancich > he/him/his > Red Hat Storage > Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA > > ___ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > -- Matt Benjamin Red Hat, Inc. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage tel. 734-821-5101 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
[ceph-users] Re: Bucket rename with
Honestly, not having a function to rename bucket from admin rgw-admin is like not having a function to copy or move. It is something basic, since if not the workarround, it is to create a new bucket and move all the files with the consequent loss of time and cost of computation. In addition to the interruption. Im sure that im not the only one administrator of rgw that need rename some buckets, because by default system let Users for example use CAPITIAL letter and that's not compliance. KR, Manuel -Mensaje original- De: J. Eric Ivancich Enviado el: viernes, 14 de febrero de 2020 20:47 Para: EDH - Manuel Rios CC: ceph-users@ceph.io Asunto: Re: [ceph-users] Bucket rename with On 2/4/20 12:29 PM, EDH - Manuel Rios wrote: > Hi > > Some Customer asked us for a normal easy problem, they want rename a bucket. > > Checking the Nautilus documentation looks by now its not possible, but I > checked master documentation and a CLI should be accomplish this apparently. > > $ radosgw-admin bucket link --bucket=foo --bucket-new-name=bar --uid=johnny > > Will be backported to Nautilus? Or its still just for developer/master users? > > https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/man/8/radosgw-admin/ Given both that it's a feature and the sheer size of the PR -- 22 commits and 32 files altered -- my guess is that it will not be backported to Nautilus. However I'll invite the principals to weigh in. Best, Eric -- J. Eric Ivancich he/him/his Red Hat Storage Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
[ceph-users] Re: Bucket rename with
On 2/4/20 12:29 PM, EDH - Manuel Rios wrote: > Hi > > Some Customer asked us for a normal easy problem, they want rename a bucket. > > Checking the Nautilus documentation looks by now its not possible, but I > checked master documentation and a CLI should be accomplish this apparently. > > $ radosgw-admin bucket link --bucket=foo --bucket-new-name=bar --uid=johnny > > Will be backported to Nautilus? Or its still just for developer/master users? > > https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/man/8/radosgw-admin/ Given both that it's a feature and the sheer size of the PR -- 22 commits and 32 files altered -- my guess is that it will not be backported to Nautilus. However I'll invite the principals to weigh in. Best, Eric -- J. Eric Ivancich he/him/his Red Hat Storage Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
