On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:21 AM Cody wrote:
> So, is it okay to say that compared to the 'firstn' mode, the 'indep'
> mode may have the least impact on a cluster in an event of OSD
> failure? Could I use 'indep' for replica pool as well?
>
You could, but shouldn't. Imagine if the primary OSD
So, is it okay to say that compared to the 'firstn' mode, the 'indep'
mode may have the least impact on a cluster in an event of OSD
failure? Could I use 'indep' for replica pool as well?
Thank you!
Regards,
Cody
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 7:12 PM Gregory Farnum wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:56 AM Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I read an earlier thread [1] that made a good explanation on the 'step
> > choose|chooseleaf' option. Could someone further help me to understand
> > the 'firstn|indep' part? Also, what is the relationship
Hi everyone,
I read an earlier thread [1] that made a good explanation on the 'step
choose|chooseleaf' option. Could someone further help me to understand
the 'firstn|indep' part? Also, what is the relationship between 'step
take' and 'step choose|chooseleaf' when it comes to define a failure
Hi everyone,
I read an earlier thread [1] that made a good explanation on the 'step
choose|chooseleaf' option. Could someone further help me to understand
the 'firstn|indep' part? Also, what is the relationship between 'step
take' and 'step choose|chooseleaf' when it comes to define a failure
