; However right now the cluster it self is pretty much toast due to the amount
> of OSD's now with this assert.
>
>
> ,Ashley
>
>
> From: Gregory Farnum <gfar...@redhat.com>
> Sent: 19 November 2017 09:25:39
> To: Ashley Merrick
> Cc: David
hley
From: Ashley Merrick
Sent: 20 November 2017 08:56:15
To: Gregory Farnum
Cc: David Turner; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] OSD Random Failures - Latest Luminous
Hello,
So I tried as suggested marking one OSD that continuously failed as lost and
add a new OSD to take it's p
017 09:25:39
To: Ashley Merrick
Cc: David Turner; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] OSD Random Failures - Latest Luminous
I only see two asserts (in my local checkout) in that function; one is metadata
assert(info.history.same_interval_since != 0);
and the other is a sanity
M Ashley Merrick <ash...@amerrick.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Any further suggestions or work around’s from anyone?
>
>
>
> Cluster is hard down now with around 2% PG’s offline, on the occasion able
> to get an OSD to start for a bit but then will
l.com>; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] OSD Random Failures - Latest Luminous
The osd shouldn't be about to peer while it's down. I think this is good
information to update your ticket with as it is possible a different code path
than anticipated.
Did your cluster see the osd a
gt;; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] OSD Random Failures - Latest Luminous
The osd shouldn't be about to peer while it's down. I think this is good
information to update your ticket with as it is possible a different code path
than anticipated.
Did your cluster see the osd as up?
On Sat,
at, Nov 18, 2017, 7:08 AM Ashley Merrick <ash...@amerrick.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Any further suggestions or work around’s from anyone?
>
>
>
> Cluster is hard down now with around 2% PG’s offline, on the occasion able
> to get an OSD to star
[mailto:sean.redmo...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 November 2017 22:40
To: Ashley Merrick <ash...@amerrick.co.uk>
Cc: David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com>; ceph-users <ceph-us...@ceph.com>
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] OSD Random Failures - Latest Luminous
Hi,
Is it possible to add new
the executable, or `objdump -rdS ` is needed
> to interpret this.
>
>
>
> I guess even with noup the OSD/PG still has the peer with the other PG’s
> which is the stage that causes the failure, most OSD’s seem to stay up for
> about 30 seconds, and every time it’s a different PG listed
a different PG listed on the failure.
,Ashley
From: David Turner [mailto:drakonst...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 November 2017 22:19
To: Ashley Merrick <ash...@amerrick.co.uk>
Cc: Eric Nelson <ericnel...@gmail.com>; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] OSD Random Failures - Latest
<ash...@amerrick.co.uk>
Cc: Eric Nelson <ericnel...@gmail.com>; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] OSD Random Failures - Latest Luminous
Does letting the cluster run with noup for a while until all down disks are
idle, and then letting them come in help at all? I don't kn
2017 17:27
> *To:* Eric Nelson <ericnel...@gmail.com>
>
> *Cc:* ceph-us...@ceph.com
> *Subject:* Re: [ceph-users] OSD Random Failures - Latest Luminous
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Good to hear it's not just me, however have a cluster basica
55700
thread_name:tp_peering"
,Ashley
From: Ashley Merrick
Sent: 16 November 2017 17:27
To: Eric Nelson <ericnel...@gmail.com>
Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] OSD Random Failures - Latest Luminous
Hello,
Good to hear it's not just me, however have a cluster basically offline
tps://aka.ms/ghei36>
From: Ashley Merrick
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 9:31:22 PM
To: Ashley Merrick; Eric Nelson
Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: RE: [ceph-users] OSD Random Failures - Latest Luminous
Have created a ticket
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues
ubject: Re: [ceph-users] OSD Random Failures - Latest Luminous
Hello,
Good to hear it's not just me, however have a cluster basically offline due to
too many OSD's dropping for this issue.
Anybody have any suggestions?
,Ashley
From: Eric Nelson &l
errick
Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] OSD Random Failures - Latest Luminous
I've been seeing these as well on our SSD cachetier that's been ravaged by disk
failures as of late Same tp_peering assert as above even running luminous
branch from git.
Let me know if you have
I've been seeing these as well on our SSD cachetier that's been ravaged by
disk failures as of late Same tp_peering assert as above even running
luminous branch from git.
Let me know if you have a bug filed I can +1 or have found a workaround.
E
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Ashley
17 matches
Mail list logo
