Hi Dave,
On Dec 2, 2013, at 16:17 , Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As best as I recall it was needed for ext4 and btrfs support on
> mounting external devices, but that was years ago.
Thanks for the information; so I used this a starting point and I have
the impression that now a days the mount-utils are needed for mount by label
and mount by UUID. And if I understand correctly the new block-mount and ubox
opkgs already allow mount-by-UUID without mount-utils. So even though I am
currently mount by label, maybe mount-util can be relegated to an optional
install in cerowrt, hoping that might solve the sysupgrade challenges.
best
Sebastian
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>>
>> On Dec 2, 2013, at 02:07 , Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is nothing more than a resync with openwrt and a bugfix for
>>> dnsmasq. It is completely untested.
>>>
>>> + fresh merge with openwrt
>>> ++ bunch of ath9k fixes
>>> + update to dnsmasq 2.68rc4 (fixes cname and a few other bugs)
>>>
>>> - haven't found time to address http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/436
>>> plan to update the machine involved to this version.
>>> hope to get more reports from the field. ? Would like to find someone
>>> with comcast ipv6 to try this on....
>>>
>>> - the /sbin/mount bug explanation sounded plausible but haven't tried it
>>> will do so shortly
>>
>> The quickest test should be to deinstall mount-utils before running
>> sys upgrade (as far as I know mount-utils is the source of the incompatible
>> mount binary). The new cerowrt will automatically bring in its already
>> installed mount-utils, so everything should work after the upgrade. I have
>> not tested this yet, but I assume this is what I'll try the next time :)
>> BTW, what is the reason we need mount-utils in the first place, or
>> what is the busy box mount command missing?
>>
>> best regards
>> sebastian
>>
>>>
>>> - have several reports of a successful "fragmentation?" crash attack
>>> in openwrt in general, but no details.
>>>
>>> I'm taking a bunch of machines into the lab thursday and hope to work
>>> on the latter problem while putting several new machines/OSes through
>>> their paces... It seemes likely I will do another build between now
>>> and thursday.
>>>
>>> In short, not a lot of reason to try this release. Feel free to keep
>>> digesting your turkey.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5_8U4j51lI
>>>
>>> New version of pie should get dropped next week.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Täht
>>>
>>> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
>>> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
