Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.24-5 dev build released

2013-12-16 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Rich, On Dec 16, 2013, at 14:45 , Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote: Dave, List, + hopefully nasty interface initialization bug fixed http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/437 In a one-out-of-one test, this build causes all six wireless interfaces to start up: CEROwrt (and

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.24-5 dev build released

2013-12-16 Thread Fred Stratton
Most work here also. I have babel turned off at present. SM worked until 0300 CET crafting the AQM lua interface. The result is clearer IMHO. The balance is about right. Thank you. DT recrafted the wifi script after visiting the cinema. I wonder if 3.10.24-5 is the precursor to Mordor builds

[Cerowrt-devel] treating 2.4ghz as -legacy?

2013-12-16 Thread Dave Taht
I have long used 5 as an indicator that the 5ghz channel was better. This goes back to a long thread on nanog, like 4? 5? years ago, where the hope was to train users that 5 was better. Well, it's turned out that 5 is frequently better, but not always, AND that clients tend to go for the shortest

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] treating 2.4ghz as -legacy?

2013-12-16 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com writes: ideas for another ssid naming standard slightly longer than a single digit that would make sense to mom? -backup / -bak? Also, many phones don't support 5ghz unfortunately, so it probably shouldn't be too offputting... -Toke signature.asc Description:

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] treating 2.4ghz as -legacy?

2013-12-16 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Dave, On Dec 16, 2013, at 20:46 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: I have long used 5 as an indicator that the 5ghz channel was better. This goes back to a long thread on nanog, like 4? 5? years ago, where the hope was to train users that 5 was better. Well, it's turned out that 5

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] treating 2.4ghz as -legacy?

2013-12-16 Thread Kelvin Edmison
I believe that generally, users understand versions and speeds but not the implications of certain frequencies. So, rather than focusing on the frequency I would throw these out there as suggestions: (even though the nit-picker in me is cringing a bit) For the 2.4GHz SSID: - CEROwrt-old -

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] treating 2.4ghz as -legacy?

2013-12-16 Thread David Lang
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Dave Taht wrote: I have long used 5 as an indicator that the 5ghz channel was better. This goes back to a long thread on nanog, like 4? 5? years ago, where the hope was to train users that 5 was better. Well, it's turned out that 5 is frequently better, but not always, AND

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt_pppoe

2013-12-16 Thread Fred Stratton
You cannot attach to the internal 'modem' because there is none present. 1. Buy gateway device, eg TP-Link TD-W8970, or use one supplied by ISP 2. Bridge it, for an ADSL connection. 3. Connect WNDR3800. 4. Configure PPPoE on WNDR3800 flashed with CeroWRT. On 16/12/13 20:50, Oliver Niesner