On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 13:24:06 +0100 Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
On Dec 14, 2013, at 07:26 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
2) it's not clear to me we have to support both the stab and
htb_private methods of fixing htb's linklayer. It was important that
these be
Hi Jesper,
On Dec 17, 2013, at 09:03 , Jesper Dangaard Brouer bro...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 13:24:06 +0100 Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
On Dec 14, 2013, at 07:26 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
2) it's not clear to me we have to support both the stab
In the new interface, htb_private is not an explicit option.
IF aqm is enabled, and linklayer protocol is 'none', is htb_private
implicitly chosen?
On 17/12/13 08:22, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi Jesper,
On Dec 17, 2013, at 09:03 , Jesper Dangaard Brouer bro...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat,
Hi Fred,
On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:39 , Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote:
In the new interface, htb_private is not an explicit option.
IF aqm is enabled, and linklayer protocol is 'none', is htb_private
implicitly chosen?
No, currently, you have no access to htb_private. I
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.cawrote:
Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote:
For best 5GHz results, get rid of your walls and doors...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/09/14/virgin_media_superhub_update_modem_mode/
Yeah, in my house, my
5GHz works when all your endpoint devices do 5GHz.
that is nowhere near a ubiquitous condition.
-mo
___
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:25 PM, dpr...@reed.com wrote:
I know it will just trigger raging arguments, but it turns out that 5 GHz
propagates far better in normal housing than does 2.4 GHz.
In particular, actual scientific measurements of penetration of wood,
fiberboard, concrete, brick,
I concur with Jim.
My observation is that in our house, upstairs the 5Ghz AP has low signal
strength
reported by the devices, and poor bandwidth.
Could it be that the radiation pattern of the antenna in WDR3800 laying
horizontally
is different for each band. Maybe the 5Ghz band is more of a
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 03:43:45PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
I concur with Jim.
My observation is that in our house, upstairs the 5Ghz AP has low
signal strength reported by the devices, and poor bandwidth.
Could it be that the radiation pattern of the antenna in WDR3800
laying
Hi Sebastian,
And while trying to make an intelligent guess, I wonder how to map
none/tc_stab into DSL and/or ATM; if adsl is the same as DSL;
No ADLS is one out of a family of xDSLs (digital subscriber lines). As
far as I know SDSL does not use ATM, VDSL1 might use ATM and all ADSL
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Rich Brown wrote:
- From what you’ve said, I don’t have much hope for doing it automagically.
But maybe we can provide clues to help the customer do to the right thing.
Perhaps the first dropdown could be “Link Layer Adjustments (used on DSL or
ATM)” with options for
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 07:04:54PM -0800, David Lang wrote:
As far as I have been able to tell this is purely a software thing.
I'm not sure that it's even that it's so complicated as it is that
there are no standards for APs to talk to each other to do this sort
of thing so nobody has tackled
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 07:04:54PM -0800, David Lang wrote:
As far as I have been able to tell this is purely a software thing.
I'm not sure that it's even that it's so complicated as it is that
there are no standards for APs to talk to each other to
13 matches
Mail list logo