On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:23 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Jonathan Morton writes:
>
> >> On 11 Dec, 2018, at 8:32 pm, Aaron Wood wrote:
> >>
> >> With all the variants of fq+AQM, maybe decoupling the FQ part and the
> >> AQM part would be worthwhile, instead of reimplementing it for
Jonathan Morton writes:
>> On 11 Dec, 2018, at 8:32 pm, Aaron Wood wrote:
>>
>> With all the variants of fq+AQM, maybe decoupling the FQ part and the
>> AQM part would be worthwhile, instead of reimplementing it for each
>> variant...
>>
>> That's a great idea, Toke. There are a lot of
I forgot to mention that freebsd also works - the only place in the entire
kernel that checks for class-e is in a leftover bit of icmp-related
code - so ping doesn't work...
but everything else does. I don't have that patch yet.
___
Cerowrt-devel mailing
"David P. Reed" writes:
> Conquer the spectrum licensing and device certification nexus. Or else
> your cell is will pwn yr physical world.
>
> LTE over UNII band is not even as good as CSMA at sharing and
> cooperation, and without coordination at installation planning time,
> it doesn't work
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:38 AM Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> > On 11 Dec, 2018, at 8:32 pm, Aaron Wood wrote:
> >
> > With all the variants of fq+AQM, maybe decoupling the FQ part and the
> > AQM part would be worthwhile, instead of reimplementing it for each
> > variant...
> >
> > That's a great
> On 11 Dec, 2018, at 8:32 pm, Aaron Wood wrote:
>
> With all the variants of fq+AQM, maybe decoupling the FQ part and the
> AQM part would be worthwhile, instead of reimplementing it for each
> variant...
>
> That's a great idea, Toke. There are a lot of places where I think it could
> work
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:32 AM Aaron Wood wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 11:51 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> Dave Taht writes:
>>
>> > https://github.com/gautamramk/FQ-PIE-for-Linux-Kernel/issues/2
>>
>> With all the variants of fq+AQM, maybe decoupling the FQ part and the
>> AQM
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 11:51 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Dave Taht writes:
>
> > https://github.com/gautamramk/FQ-PIE-for-Linux-Kernel/issues/2
>
> With all the variants of fq+AQM, maybe decoupling the FQ part and the
> AQM part would be worthwhile, instead of reimplementing it for each
