Any ideas for a name for packet scheduling, prioritization, and active
queue management better than just AQM, or QoS?
SQM Smarter Queue Management
CeroShaper
LBO Latency and Bandwidth Optimisation
--
Dave Täht
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
Dave,
You wrote:
What's in a name? AQM has been pretty thoroughly defined to equal
active queue *length* management and not packet scheduling.
Overloading AQM what cerowrt does is apt to cause even more
confusion in the field than it already does. We discussed using LBO as
a word but that
On Dec 20, 2013, at 4:22 PM, dpr...@reed.com wrote:
They are based on a completely false premise - that queues should be allowed
to build at all, and that local information can solve highly transient global
problems.
Dumb Queue Management is going to be far superior. Keep the queue at
Hi David,
On Dec 20, 2013, at 22:22 , dpr...@reed.com wrote:
Given that there is no likelihood of making localized queue management
intelligent because it has no global information whatsoever, I strongly
suggest that smart intelligent and even active are hugely misleading.
They are
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:22 PM, dpr...@reed.com wrote:
Given that there is no likelihood of making localized queue management
intelligent because it has no global information whatsoever, I strongly
suggest that smart intelligent and even active are hugely misleading.
They are based on a
Folks,
I just remembered that about a year ago, Bill McGonigle offered a “marketing
name” for CeroWrt - BroadbandEQ. He wrote:
From: Bill McGonigle b...@bfccomputing.com
Subject: Re: Dang, I forgot...
Date: December 10, 2012 11:13:55 PM EST
To: Richard Brown
Rationale: Not a precise
Given that StreamBoost(tm) consists of fq_codel + bigfoots packet
classification technology and service which gives prioritization to
gamer packets + some kind of automatic rate finder (better than
gargoyle's ACC I'm told). I am increasingly irked by how the roles
these technologies' interplay are
