Re: [Cerowrt-devel] aqm gui feedback on cerowrt-3.10.24-1 for linklayer adaption

2013-12-17 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 13:24:06 +0100 Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote: On Dec 14, 2013, at 07:26 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: 2) it's not clear to me we have to support both the stab and htb_private methods of fixing htb's linklayer. It was important that these be

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] aqm gui feedback on cerowrt-3.10.24-1 for linklayer adaption

2013-12-17 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Jesper, On Dec 17, 2013, at 09:03 , Jesper Dangaard Brouer bro...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 13:24:06 +0100 Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote: On Dec 14, 2013, at 07:26 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: 2) it's not clear to me we have to support both the stab

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] aqm gui feedback on cerowrt-3.10.24-1 for linklayer adaption

2013-12-17 Thread Fred Stratton
In the new interface, htb_private is not an explicit option. IF aqm is enabled, and linklayer protocol is 'none', is htb_private implicitly chosen? On 17/12/13 08:22, Sebastian Moeller wrote: Hi Jesper, On Dec 17, 2013, at 09:03 , Jesper Dangaard Brouer bro...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat,

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] aqm gui feedback on cerowrt-3.10.24-1 for linklayer adaption

2013-12-17 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Fred, On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:39 , Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote: In the new interface, htb_private is not an explicit option. IF aqm is enabled, and linklayer protocol is 'none', is htb_private implicitly chosen? No, currently, you have no access to htb_private. I

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] aqm gui feedback on cerowrt-3.10.24-1 for linklayer adaption

2013-12-15 Thread Sebastian Moeller
hI Dave hi list, On Dec 14, 2013, at 07:26 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: one of the things that makes me happy with all-up testing is that occasionally after completely blowing up my own work, I get to critique fresh work that isn't mine, in an area with which I have no expertise,

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] aqm gui feedback on cerowrt-3.10.24-1 for linklayer adaption

2013-12-15 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Dave, On Dec 14, 2013, at 07:26 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: one of the things that makes me happy with all-up testing is that occasionally after completely blowing up my own work, I get to critique fresh work that isn't mine, in an area with which I have no expertise, with

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] aqm gui feedback on cerowrt-3.10.24-1 for linklayer adaption

2013-12-15 Thread Dave Taht
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Dave, On Dec 14, 2013, at 07:26 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: one of the things that makes me happy with all-up testing is that occasionally after completely blowing up my own work, I get to critique fresh

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] aqm gui feedback on cerowrt-3.10.24-1 for linklayer adaption

2013-12-14 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Dave, On Dec 14, 2013, at 07:26 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: one of the things that makes me happy with all-up testing is that occasionally after completely blowing up my own work, I get to critique fresh work that isn't mine, in an area with which I have no expertise, with